Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29641441›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Cancer Services and Their Initiatives to Improve the Care of Indigenous Australians.

Emma V Taylor, Margaret M Haigh, Shaouli Shahid, Gail Garvey, Joan Cunningham, Sandra C Thompson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Improving Access to Cancer Treatment Services in Australia's Northern Territory-History and Progress.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Communicating cancer and its treatment to Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients with cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  9. The utilization of allied and community health services by cancer patients living in regional and remote geographical areas in Australia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma V TaylorWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, WA 6530, Australia. emma.taylor@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8612-4738
Margaret M HaighWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, WA 6530, Australia. margaret.haigh@uwa.edu.au.
Shaouli ShahidWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, WA 6530, Australia. S.Shahid@curtin.edu.au.
Gail GarveyMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0811, Australia. Gail.Garvey@menzies.edu.au.
Joan CunninghamMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0811, Australia. joan.cunningham@menzies.edu.au.
Sandra C ThompsonWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, WA 6530, Australia. sandra.thompson@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0327-7155
The University of Western Australia · AUCharles Darwin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous Australians continue to experience significantly poorer outcomes from cancer than non-Indigenous Australians. Despite the importance of culturally appropriate cancer services in improving outcomes, there is a lack of awareness of current programs and initiatives that are aimed at meeting the needs of Indigenous patients. Telephone interviews were used to identify and describe the Indigenous-specific programs and initiatives that are implemented in a subset of the services that participated in a larger national online survey of cancer treatment services. Fourteen services located across Australia participated in the interviews. Participants identified a number of factors that were seen as critical to delivering culturally appropriate treatment and support, including having a trained workforce with effective cross-cultural communication skills, providing best practice care, and improving the knowledge, attitudes, and understanding of cancer by Indigenous people. However, over a third of participants were not sure how their service compared with others, indicating that they were not aware of how other services are doing in this field. There are currently many Indigenous-specific programs and initiatives that are aimed at providing culturally appropriate treatment and supporting Indigenous people affected by cancer across Australia. However, details of these initiatives are not widely known and barriers to information sharing exist. Further research in this area is needed to evaluate programs and initiatives and showcase the effective approaches to Indigenous cancer care.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesHealth Services, IndigenousAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleNeoplasmsAboriginal and Torres Strait Islandercancercancer carecancer servicescultural safetyIndigenous Australianstreatment

Identifiers

PMID29641441
PMCPMC5923759
OpenAlexW2797139864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.