Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29641430›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Estimation from ECG Using Machine Learning Techniques.

Monika Simjanoska, Martin Gjoreski, Matjaž Gams, Ana Madevska Bogdanova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Forecasting intraoperative hypotension during hepatobiliary surgery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Big Data in electrophysiology.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika SimjanoskaFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rugjer Boshkovikj 16, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia. monika.simjanoska@finki.ukim.mk.ORCID 0000-0002-5028-3841
Martin GjoreskiDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. martin.gjoreski@ijs.si.
Matjaž GamsDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. matjaz.gams@ijs.si.
Ana Madevska BogdanovaFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Rugjer Boshkovikj 16, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia. ana.madevska.bogdanova@finki.ukim.mk.
Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School · SISs. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje · MK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood pressure (BP) measurements have been used widely in clinical and private environments. Recently, the use of ECG monitors has proliferated; however, they are not enabled with BP estimation. We have developed a method for BP estimation using only electrocardiogram (ECG) signals.

methodsRaw ECG data are filtered and segmented, and, following this, a complexity analysis is performed for feature extraction. Then, a machine-learning method is applied, combining a stacking-based classification module and a regression module for building systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) predictive models. In addition, the method allows a probability distribution-based calibration to adapt the models to a particular user.

resultsUsing ECG recordings from 51 different subjects, 3129 30-s ECG segments are constructed, and seven features are extracted. Using a train-validation-test evaluation, the method achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 8.64 mmHg for SBP, 18.20 mmHg for DBP, and 13.52 mmHg for the MAP prediction. When models are calibrated, the MAE decreases to 7.72 mmHg for SBP, 9.45 mmHg for DBP and 8.13 mmHg for MAP.

conclusionThe experimental results indicate that, when a probability distribution-based calibration is used, the proposed method can achieve results close to those of a certified medical device for BP estimation.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCalibrationElectrocardiographyHumansMachine Learningblood pressureclassificationcomplexity analysisECGmachine learningregressionstacking

Identifiers

PMID29641430
PMCPMC5949031
OpenAlexW2796697326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.