Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29641233›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2018

Efficacy and safety of antenatal steroids.

Matthew W Kemp, Alan H Jobe, Haruo Usuda, Peter W Nathanielsz, Cun Li, Anderson Kuo, Hillary F Huber, Geoffrey D Clarke, Masatoshi Saito, John P Newnham and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Late preterm antenatal steroid use and infant outcomes in a single center.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Matthew W KempDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia , Perth , Australia.
Alan H JobeDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia , Perth , Australia.
Haruo UsudaDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia , Perth , Australia.
Peter W NathanielszDepartment of Animal Science, University of Wyoming , Laramie, Wyoming.
Cun LiDepartment of Animal Science, University of Wyoming , Laramie, Wyoming.
Anderson KuoDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio , San Antonio, Texas.
Hillary F HuberDepartment of Animal Science, University of Wyoming , Laramie, Wyoming.
Geoffrey D ClarkeDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio , San Antonio, Texas.
Masatoshi SaitoDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia , Perth , Australia.
John P NewnhamDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia , Perth , Australia.
Sarah J StockDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia , Perth , Australia.

Funding

Womb to Tomb: Developmental Programming and Aging Interactions in PrimatesU19AG057758 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CLARKE, GEOFFREY DAVID, COX, LAURA A · 2018 to 2024
$13.2M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG057758Wellcome Trust 209560/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antenatal steroids (ANS) are among the most important and widely utilized interventions to improve outcomes for preterm infants. A significant body of evidence demonstrates improved outcomes in preterm infants (24-34 wk) delivered between 1 and 7 days after the administration of a single course of ANS. Moreover, ANS have the advantage of being widely available, low cost, and easily administered via maternal intramuscular injection. The use of ANS to mature the fetal lung is, however, not without contention. Their use in pregnancy is not FDA approved, and treatment doses and regimens remain largely unoptimized. Their mode of use varies considerably between countries, and there are lingering concerns regarding the safety of exposing the fetus to high doses of exogenous steroids. A significant proportion of women deliver outside the 1- to 7-day therapeutic window after ANS treatment, and this delay may be associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes for both mother and baby. Today, animal-based studies are one means by which key questions of dosing and safety relating to ANS may be resolved, allowing for further refinement(s) of this important therapy. Complementary approaches using nonhuman primates, sheep, and rodents have provided invaluable advances to our understanding of how exogenous steroid exposure impacts fetal development. Focusing on these three major model groups, this review highlights the role of three key animal models (sheep, nonhuman primates, rodents) in the development of antenatal steroid therapy, and provides an up-to-date synthesis of current efforts to refine this therapy in an era of personalised medicine.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Dosage CalculationsFemaleFetal Organ MaturityGestational AgeHumansLungMicePregnancyPremature BirthPrimatesRatsSteroidsanimal modelantenatal steroidsfetal maturationpreterm birthprimaterodentsheep

Identifiers

PMID29641233
PMCPMC11961112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.