Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29638165›Full record

ArticleFoodborne pathogens and disease2018

Intensified Sampling in Response to a Salmonella Heidelberg Outbreak Associated with Multiple Establishments Within a Single Poultry Corporation.

Alice Green, Stephanie Defibaugh-Chavez, Aphrodite Douris, Danah Vetter, Richard Atkinson, Bonnie Kissler, Allison Khroustalev, Kis Robertson, Yudhbir Sharma, Karen Becker and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investigating Stress Tolerance of MultipleInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Salmonella enterica subsp.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Alice Green1 Office of Public Health Science, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Stephanie Defibaugh-Chavez1 Office of Public Health Science, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Aphrodite Douris1 Office of Public Health Science, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Danah Vetter1 Office of Public Health Science, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Richard Atkinson6 Office of Field Operations, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Denver, Colorado.
Bonnie Kissler1 Office of Public Health Science, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Allison Khroustalev8 Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California.
Kis Robertson1 Office of Public Health Science, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Yudhbir Sharma6 Office of Field Operations, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Denver, Colorado.
Karen Becker1 Office of Public Health Science, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Uday Dessai1 Office of Public Health Science, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Nisha Antoine9 Office of Policy and Program Development, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, District of Columbia.
Latasha Allen10 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response , Office of Emergency Management, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (formerly affiliated with Office of Public Health Science, USDA-FSIS), Washington, District of Columbia.
Kristin Holt1 Office of Public Health Science, Food Safety and Inspection Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Laura Gieraltowski11 Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
Matthew Wise11 Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
Colin Schwensohn11 Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On June 28, 2013, the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) was notified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of an investigation of a multistate cluster of illnesses of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg. Since case-patients in the cluster reported consumption of a variety of chicken products, FSIS used a simple likelihood-based approach using traceback information to focus on intensified sampling efforts. This article describes the multiphased product sampling approach taken by FSIS when epidemiologic evidence implicated chicken products from multiple establishments operating under one corporation. The objectives of sampling were to (1) assess process control of chicken slaughter and further processing and (2) determine whether outbreak strains were present in products from these implicated establishments. As part of the sample collection process, data collected by FSIS personnel to characterize product included category (whole chicken and type of chicken parts), brand, organic or conventional product, injection with salt solutions or flavorings, and whether product was skinless or skin-on. From the period September 9, 2013, through October 31, 2014, 3164 samples were taken as part of this effort. Salmonella percent positive declined from 19.7% to 5.3% during this timeframe as a result of regulatory and company efforts. The results of intensified sampling for this outbreak investigation informed an FSIS regulatory response and corrective actions taken by the implicated establishments. The company noted that a multihurdle approach to reduce Salmonella in products was taken, including on-farm efforts such as environmental testing, depopulation of affected flocks, disinfection of affected houses, vaccination, and use of various interventions within the establishments over the course of several months.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChickensDrug Resistance, BacterialFoodborne DiseasesFood InspectionHumansLikelihood FunctionsSalmonella entericaSalmonella Food PoisoningUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistance in bacteria of animal originfoodborne diseasefood safetypoultrySalmonella

Identifiers

PMID29638165
PMCPMC5865244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.