Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29637509›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Safety, efficacy and survival of patients with primary malignant brain tumours (PMBT) in phase I (Ph1) trials: the 12-year Royal Marsden experience.

Niamh Coleman, Vasiliki Michalarea, Scheryll Alken, Karim Rihawi, Raquel Perez Lopez, Nina Tunariu, Ann Petruckevitch, L R Molife, Udai Banerji, Johann S De Bono and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Assessment of Karnofsky (KPS) and WHO (WHO-PS) performance scores in brain tumour patients: the role of clinician bias.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niamh ColemanDrug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5803-9528
Vasiliki MichalareaDrug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Scheryll AlkenDrug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Karim RihawiDrug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Raquel Perez LopezRadiology Department, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Nina TunariuRadiology Department, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Ann PetruckevitchDrug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
L R MolifeDrug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Udai BanerjiDrug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Johann S De BonoDrug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Liam WelshNeuro-oncology Department, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Frank SaranNeuro-oncology Department, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
Juanita LopezDrug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK. Juanita.lopez@icr.ac.uk.
Institute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11566Cancer Research UK 22897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary malignant brain tumours (PMBT) constitute less than 2% of all malignancies and carry a dismal prognosis. Treatment options at relapse are limited. First-in-human solid tumour studies have historically excluded patients with PMBT due to the poor prognosis, concomitant drug interactions and concerns regarding toxicities.

methodsRetrospective data were collected on clinical and tumour characteristics of patients referred for consideration of Ph1 trials in the Royal Marsden Hospital between June 2004 and August 2016. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards model. Chi squared test was used to measure bivariate associations between categorical variables.

results100pts with advanced PMBT were referred. At initial consultation, patients had a median ECOG PS 1, median age 48 years (range 18-70); 69% were men, 76% had glioblastoma; 68% were on AEDs, 63% required steroid therapy; median number of prior treatments was two. Median OS for patients treated on a Ph1 trials was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.9-12.9) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 4.1-6.1) for patients that did not proceed with a Ph1 trial, p = 0.0094. Steroid use, poor PS, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and treatment on a Ph1 trial were shown to independently influence OS.

conclusionsWe report a survival benefit for patients with PMBT treated on Ph1 trials. Toxicity and efficacy outcomes were comparable to the general Ph1 population. In the absence of an internationally recognized standard second line treatment for patients with recurrent PMBT, more Ph1 trials should allow enrolment of patients with refractory PMBT and Ph1 trial participation should be considered at an earlier stage.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGliomaHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPatient SafetyReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsDrug developmentGlioblastomaHigh grade gliomaMalignant brain tumourPhase I

Identifiers

PMID29637509
OpenAlexW2796820823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.