ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2018
Long-Term Outcomes of Unlocking Chinese Patients with Severe Mental Illness.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serious mental health conditions and exposure to adulthood trauma in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2006, the "unlocking program" was implemented in Hebei province, China to promote the human rights for people with severe mental illness who were physically restrained at home. We assessed the long term outcomes of the "unlocking program" following the provision of hospital and community psychiatric care over 10 years and explored their associated factors. A total of 107 patients with severe mental illness who were "unlocked" in the program were included. Outcome measures were collected with standardized rating scales at 2 separate time points in August 2012 and November 2016. Poor outcome was defined either as being relocked, or missing to follow up or death. In 2012, 36 patients (33.6%) had poor outcomes. Poor outcome was positively associated with follow-up length and less caregiver burden at baseline. By 2016, 53 patients (49.5%) were found to have poor outcomes. There was only a trend of positive association between poor outcome and less caregiver burden at baseline. Poor long-term outcomes were common in patients with severe mental illness following the "unlocking program". Evidence-based treatment strategies and mental health services to improve the outcomes and protect the human rights of patients subjected to being locked in the community are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29637466What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.