Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29637403›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2018

Accurate Diabetes Risk Stratification Using Machine Learning: Role of Missing Value and Outliers.

Md Maniruzzaman, Md Jahanur Rahman, Md Al-MehediHasan, Harman S Suri, Md Menhazul Abedin, Ayman El-Baz, Jasjit S Suri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. AI-Based Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Md ManiruzzamanDepartment of Statistics, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.
Md Jahanur RahmanDepartment of Statistics, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.
Md Al-MehediHasanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.
Harman S SuriBrown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Md Menhazul AbedinStatistics Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Ayman El-BazDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Jasjit S SuriStroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint LLC, Roseville, CA, USA. jasjit.suri@atheropoint.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic diseases in which blood sugar levels are too high. About 8.8% of the world was diabetic in 2017. It is projected that this will reach nearly 10% by 2045. The major challenge is that when machine learning-based classifiers are applied to such data sets for risk stratification, leads to lower performance. Thus, our objective is to develop an optimized and robust machine learning (ML) system under the assumption that missing values or outliers if replaced by a median configuration will yield higher risk stratification accuracy. This ML-based risk stratification is designed, optimized and evaluated, where: (i) the features are extracted and optimized from the six feature selection techniques (random forest, logistic regression, mutual information, principal component analysis, analysis of variance, and Fisher discriminant ratio) and combined with ten different types of classifiers (linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, naïve Bayes, Gaussian process classification, support vector machine, artificial neural network, Adaboost, logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest) under the hypothesis that both missing values and outliers when replaced by computed medians will improve the risk stratification accuracy. Pima Indian diabetic dataset (768 patients: 268 diabetic and 500 controls) was used. Our results demonstrate that on replacing the missing values and outliers by group median and median values, respectively and further using the combination of random forest feature selection and random forest classification technique yields an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve as: 92.26%, 95.96%, 79.72%, 91.14%, 91.20%, and 0.93, respectively. This is an improvement of 10% over previously developed techniques published in literature. The system was validated for its stability and reliability. RF-based model showed the best performance when outliers are replaced by median values.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAge DistributionArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremBlood GlucoseBlood PressureBody Weights and MeasuresData Interpretation, StatisticalDecision Support TechniquesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansIndians, North AmericanMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseDiabetesFeature selectionMachine learningMissing valuesOutliersRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID29637403
PMCPMC5893681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.