ArticleJournal of medical systems2018
Accurate Diabetes Risk Stratification Using Machine Learning: Role of Missing Value and Outliers.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning models for predicting perioperative myocardial injury in non-cardiac surgery.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Use of continuous glucose monitoring systems in pediatric patients in the perioperative environment: Challenges and machine learning opportunities.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Review
- Machine learning prediction model for medical environment comfort based on SHAP and LIME interpretability analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Use of Automated Machine Learning to Detect Undiagnosed Diabetes in US Adults: Development and Validation Study.JMIR AI · 2025Article
- Symptoms affecting the development of diabetes: analysis of risk factors with data mining.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Machine learning classification of active viewing of pain and non-pain images using EEG does not exceed chance in external validation samples.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- AI-driven analysis of diabetes risk determinants in U.S. adults: Exploring disease prevalence and health factors.PloS one · 2025Article
- Padding interpolation, median imputation, RobustScalar, and particle swarm optimization with heterogeneous classifiers: a robust combination for effective heart disease diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of Missing Data on Glaucoma Severity Among Participants in the NIH All of Us Research Program of the United States.Journal of glaucoma · 2025Article
- Article
- Robust diabetic prediction using ensemble machine learning models with synthetic minority over-sampling technique.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- AI-Based Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Applying machine learning approaches for predicting obesity risk using US health administrative claims database.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2024Observational
- GeneAI 3.0: powerful, novel, generalized hybrid and ensemble deep learning frameworks for miRNA species classification of stationary patterns from nucleotides.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Hybrid feature selection and classification technique for early prediction and severity of diabetes type 2.PloS one · 2024Review
- COVLIAS 3.0: cloud-based quantized hybrid UNet3+ deep learning for COVID-19 lesion detection in lung computed tomography.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- An intelligent diabetes classification and perception framework based on ensemble and deep learning method.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Predictive modeling of multi-class diabetes mellitus using machine learning and filtering iraqi diabetes data dynamics.PloS one · 2024Article
- Optimizing diabetes classification with a machine learning-based framework.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic diseases in which blood sugar levels are too high. About 8.8% of the world was diabetic in 2017. It is projected that this will reach nearly 10% by 2045. The major challenge is that when machine learning-based classifiers are applied to such data sets for risk stratification, leads to lower performance. Thus, our objective is to develop an optimized and robust machine learning (ML) system under the assumption that missing values or outliers if replaced by a median configuration will yield higher risk stratification accuracy. This ML-based risk stratification is designed, optimized and evaluated, where: (i) the features are extracted and optimized from the six feature selection techniques (random forest, logistic regression, mutual information, principal component analysis, analysis of variance, and Fisher discriminant ratio) and combined with ten different types of classifiers (linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, naïve Bayes, Gaussian process classification, support vector machine, artificial neural network, Adaboost, logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest) under the hypothesis that both missing values and outliers when replaced by computed medians will improve the risk stratification accuracy. Pima Indian diabetic dataset (768 patients: 268 diabetic and 500 controls) was used. Our results demonstrate that on replacing the missing values and outliers by group median and median values, respectively and further using the combination of random forest feature selection and random forest classification technique yields an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve as: 92.26%, 95.96%, 79.72%, 91.14%, 91.20%, and 0.93, respectively. This is an improvement of 10% over previously developed techniques published in literature. The system was validated for its stability and reliability. RF-based model showed the best performance when outliers are replaced by median values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.