ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2018
Understanding the Haemodynamics of Hypertension.
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Wearable Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices: Understanding Heterogeneity in Design and Evaluation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024Pooled it
- Interindividual variability in static apnoea performance is partly explained by genetic factors.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Examining temporal changes in model-optimized parameters using longitudinal hemodynamic measurements.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
- Hemodynamic profiles of arterial hypertension with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023Article
- Effects of inspiratory muscle training in patients with hypertension: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Associations between Heart Rate Variability Parameters and Hemodynamic Profiles in Patients with Primary Arterial Hypertension, Including Antihypertensive Treatment Effects.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Haemodynamics of Hypertension in Children.Current hypertension reports · 2020Review
- Maternal Hypertension, Advanced Doppler Haemodynamics and Therapeutic Precision: Principles and Illustrative Cases.Current hypertension reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis article introduces the haemodynamic principles that underpin the pathophysiology of hypertension and introduces a rational physiological approach to appropriate pharmacologic treatment. RECENT
findingsOutdated understanding of haemodynamics based on previous measurement systems can no longer be applied to our understanding of the circulation. We question the current view of hypertension as defined by a predominantly systolic blood pressure and introduce the concept of vasogenic, cardiogenic and mixed-origin hypertension. We postulate that failure to identify the individual's haemodynamic pattern may lead to the use of inappropriate medication, which in turn may be a major factor in patient non-compliance with therapeutic strategies. A population-based approach to treatment of hypertension may lead to suboptimal functional dynamics in the individual patient. Finally, we question the validity of current guidelines and published evidence relating morbidity and mortality to the future treatment of hypertension. The importance of individual haemodynamic profiles may be pivotal in the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of hypertension if optimal control with minimal adverse effects is to be achieved. Research based on individual haemodynamic patterns is overdue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29637390What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.