Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29637302›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2018

[Treated cases of retinopathy of prematurity in Germany : 5-year data from the Retina.net ROP registry].

J M Walz, S Bemme, S Reichl, S Akman, H Breuß, D Süsskind, B Glitz, V C Müller, L Wagenfeld, A Gabel-Pfisterer and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Safety profile of anesthetic modalities during laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [Epidemiology and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. The Hannover data in the Retina.net ROP registry from 2001-2017].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. [Screening for retinopathy of prematurity: Trends over the past 5 years in two German university hospitals].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

J M WalzKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
S BemmeKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
S ReichlKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
S AkmanUniversitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
H BreußKlinik für Augenheilkunde, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Deutschland.
D SüsskindUniversitäts-Augenklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
B GlitzKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universität Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
V C MüllerKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universität Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
L WagenfeldKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
A Gabel-PfistererKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Deutschland.
S AisenbreyKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Deutschland.
K EngelmannKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Deutschland.
A KoutsonasKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
T U KrohneUniversitäts-Augenklinik Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
A StahlKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. andreas.stahl@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Retina.net ROP-Register-Studiengruppe
University of Freiburg · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Münster · DEVivantes Klinikum · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEOphthalmology Clinic · DEUniversitäts-Augenklinik Bonn · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the main reasons for childhood blindness. The number of infants requiring treatment, however, is low for individual centers. The Retina.net ROP registry has been founded to allow a joint analysis of treatment patterns and courses post treatment.

objectiveThis paper reports treatment patterns over 5 years. MATERIAL AND

methodsAll infants born between January 2011 and December 2015 who were entered into the treatment registry by one of the 12 participating centers were analyzed.

resultsThe data of 150 infants (292 eyes) were analyzed and ROP 3+ in zone II was the most prevalent treatment indication. Gestational age and birth weight remained stable over the years. The treatment patterns, however, changed with anti-VEGF treatment (bevacizumab or ranibizumab) accounting for only 10% of treated eyes in 2011 but for 56% and 30% in 2014 and 2015, respectively. Almost all eyes with AP-ROP or zone I disease received anti-VEGF treatment. Zone II disease was predominantly treated with laser photocoagulation. Recurrences were more common and appeared later in the anti-VEGF group compared to the laser group (23%/interval 60 days vs. 17%/interval 23 days). Perioperative complications were evenly distributed across treatment groups.

conclusionThe data in this analysis represent about 10-15% of treated infants in Germany. The results provide evidence for an increasing use of anti-VEGF agents for ROP. The data reflect a selection bias for anti-VEGF treatment in eyes with a more aggressive disease. This needs to be considered when interpreting data such as disease recurrence rates. The risk for late recurrences after anti-VEGF treatment is of particular clinical significance.

Indexed as

Retinopathy of PrematurityAngiogenesis InhibitorsGermanyGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntravitreal InjectionsLaser CoagulationRegistriesRetinaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-VEGFLaser coagulationpreterm birthRetina.netRetinopathy

Identifiers

PMID29637302
OpenAlexW2798153203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.