ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2017
Developing, implementing and disseminating a core outcome set for neonatal medicine.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Development of Core Outcome Measures sets for paediatric and adult Severe Asthma (COMSA).The European respiratory journal · 2023Pooled it
- Standardizing definitions and reporting guidelines for the infertility core outcome set: an international consensus development study† ‡.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2020Pooled it
- Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set.International urogynecology journal · 2018Pooled it
- Antibiotics at the time of removal of central venous catheter to reduce morbidity and mortality in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Research priorities for the most premature babies born <25 weeks' gestation: results of an international priority setting partnership.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2025Article
- Developing a Neonatal Pulmonary Hypertension Core Outcome Set (NeoPH COS)-A Study Protocol.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- Development of a core outcome set for neonatal septic shock management: a study protocol.Trials · 2024Article
- Review
- Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for stillbirth care research (iCHOOSE Study).BMJ open · 2022Article
- The development of a core outcomes set for self-management interventions for patients living with obesity.Clinical obesity · 2022Review
- Article
- Protocol for the development of Core Outcome Sets for Early intervention trials to Prevent Obesity in CHildren (COS-EPOCH).BMJ open · 2021Article
- Article
- Developing a core outcome set for future infertility research: an international consensus development study† ‡.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- A core outcome set for trials of infant-feeding interventions to prevent childhood obesity.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2020Article
- Implementing change for facility-based peripartum care in low-income and middle-income countries.The Lancet. Global health · 2020Article
- Parents' perceptions of core outcomes in neonatal research in two Nigerian neonatal units.BMJ paediatrics open · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn high resource settings, 1 in 10 newborn babies require admission to a neonatal unit. Research evaluating neonatal care involves recording and reporting many different outcomes and outcome measures. Such variation limits the usefulness of research as studies cannot be compared or combined. To address these limitations, we aim to develop, disseminate and implement a core outcome set for neonatal medicine.
methodsA steering group that includes parents and former patients, healthcare professionals and researchers has been formed to guide the development of the core outcome set. We will review neonatal trials systematically to identify previously reported outcomes. Additionally, we will specifically identify outcomes of importance to parents, former patients and healthcare professionals through a systematic review of qualitative studies. Outcomes identified will be entered into an international, multi-perspective eDelphi survey. All key stakeholders will be invited to participate. The Delphi method will encourage individual and group stakeholder consensus to identify a core outcome set. The core outcome set will be mapped to existing, routinely recorded data where these exist. DISCUSSION: Use of a core set will ensure outcomes of importance to key stakeholders, including former patients and parents, are recorded and reported in a standard fashion in future research. Embedding the core outcome set within future clinical studies will extend the usefulness of research to inform practice, enhance patient care and ultimately improve outcomes. Using routinely recorded electronic data will facilitate implementation with minimal addition burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database: 842 (www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/842).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.