Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636991›Full record

ArticleESMO open2018

Relevance of a molecular tumour board (MTB) for patients' enrolment in clinical trials: experience of the Institut Curie.

Clémence Basse, Claire Morel, Marie Alt, Marie Paule Sablin, Coralie Franck, Gaëlle Pierron, Céline Callens, Samia Melaabi, Julien Masliah-Planchon, Guillaume Bataillon and 24 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Noninvasive Multicancer Detection Using DNA Hypomethylation of LINE-1 Retrotransposons.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular tumor board in patients with metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Clémence Basse *Department of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Claire Morel *Department of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Marie AltDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Marie Paule SablinDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Coralie FranckDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Gaëlle PierronDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Céline CallensDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Samia MelaabiDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Julien Masliah-PlanchonDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Guillaume BataillonDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Sophie GardratDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Marion LavigneDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Benjamin BonsangDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Pauline VaflardDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Elvire Pons TostivintDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Coraline DubotDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Delphine LoiratDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Miguelle MarousDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Romain GeissDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Nathalie ClémentDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Gudrun SchleiermacherDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Choumouss KamounINSERM U900 Research Unit, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Elodie GirardINSERM U900 Research Unit, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Maude ArdinINSERM U900 Research Unit, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Camille BenoistDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Virginie BernardDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Odette MarianiDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Roman RouzierINSERM U900 Research Unit, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Patricia TrescaDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Vincent ServoisDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Anne Vincent-SalomonDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Ivan BiecheDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Christophe Le TourneauDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Maud KamalDepartment of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Institut Curie · FRUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh throughput molecular screening techniques allow the identification of multiple molecular alterations, some of which are actionable and can be targeted by molecularly targeted agents (MTA). We aimed at evaluating the relevance of using this approach in the frame of Institut Curie Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) to guide patients with cancer to clinical trials with MTAs. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe included all patients presented at Institut Curie MTB from 4 October 2014 to 31 October 2017. The following information was extracted from the chart: decision to perform tumour profiling, types of molecular analyses, samples used, molecular alterations identified and those which are actionable, and inclusion in a clinical trial with matched MTA.

results736 patients were presented at the MTB. Molecular analyses were performed in 442 patients (60%). Techniques used included next-generation sequencing, comparative genomic hybridisation array and/or other techniques including immunohistochemistry in 78%, 51% and 58% of patients, respectively. Analyses were performed on a fresh frozen biopsy in 91 patients (21%), on archival tissue (fixed or frozen) in 326 patients (74%) and on both archival and fresh frozen biopsy in 25 patients (6%). At least one molecular alteration was identified in 280 analysed patients (63%). An actionable molecular alteration was identified in 207 analysed patients (47%). Forty-five analysed patients (10%) were enrolled in a clinical trial with matched MTA and 29 additional patients were oriented and included in a clinical trial based on a molecular alteration identified prior to the MTB analysis. Median time between date of specimen reception and molecular results was 28 days (range: 5-168).

conclusionsThe implementation of an MTB at Institut Curie enabled the inclusion of 10% of patients into a clinical trial with matched therapy.

Indexed as

clinical trialsmolecular tumour boardtargeted therapytumour profiling

Identifiers

PMID29636991
PMCPMC5890857
OpenAlexW2795373371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.