Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636987›Full record

ReviewESMO open2018

Consensus on management of metastatic colorectal cancer in Central America and the Caribbean: San José, Costa Rica, August 2016.

Roberto Ivan López, Jenny Lissette Castro, Heidy Cedeño, Dagoberto Cisneros, Luis Corrales, Ileana González-Herrera, Mayté Lima-Pérez, Rogelio Prestol, Roberto Salinas, Jorge Luis Soriano-García and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Percutaneous ethanol injection for liver metastases.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Roberto Ivan LópezOncology Department, National Oncological Institute, Panama City, Panama.
Jenny Lissette CastroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Oncology Hospital, Salvadorian Institute of Social Security, Rosales National Hospital, San Salvador, El Salvador.
Heidy CedeñoDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Oncological Institute, Panama City, Panama.
Dagoberto CisnerosMedical Department, Clinical Oncology Hospital, Nicaragua.
Luis CorralesCenter for Research and Management of Cancer (CIMCA), San José, Costa Rica.
Ileana González-HerreraVITA Oncology Group, San José, Costa Rica.
Mayté Lima-PérezFunctional Unit of Digestive Tumors, Hermanos Ameijeiras University Hospital, La Habana, Cuba.
Rogelio PrestolDepartment of Digestive Tumors, National School of Oncology, Dominican Republic.
Roberto SalinasMedical Oncology, Oncology Hospital, Salvadorian Institute of Social Security, San Salvador, EI Salvador.
Jorge Luis Soriano-GarcíaClinical Oncology Department, Hermanos Ameijeiras University Hospital, La Habana, Cuba.
Alejandra T ZavalaClinical Oncology, San Felipe Hospital of Specialties, Honduras.
Luis Miguel ZetinaCancer Consultants, Guatemala.
Carlos Eduardo Zúñiga-OrlichClinical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, San José, Costa Rica.
Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital · CUNational Oncologic Institute · PALiga Nacional Contra el Cáncer · GTUniversidad de Costa Rica · CR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and the second most common in women worldwide. In Latin America and the Caribbean, it has a mortality of 56%. The median overall survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is currently estimated as ~30 months, which has substantially improved through strategic changes in treatment and in the management of patients. As opposed to other metastatic cancers where first-line regimens are often determined, mCRC requires special attention because there is controversy in the possible combinations of the available drugs and the different periods of duration for each patient. Each combination must seek to be effective and to generate the minimum adverse effects as possible. Instead of giving the first-line regimen until the tumour progresses, treatment is often individualised. Furthermore, up to 60% of colorectal tumours are considered non-mutated or wild-type CRC. Not harbouring mutations in the RAS family of genes or mutations in the signalling pathways of the epidermal growth factor receptor causes a null response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy, which implies even more complex considerations regarding its management. The primary objective of this consensus is to address the main scenarios of mCRC in order to warrant the most appropriate therapeutic intervention for these patients in the Central American and the Caribbean (CAC) region. This can lead to better clinical outcomes as well as quality of life for palliative patients. This document includes the formal expert consensus recommendations for scenarios of mutated and non-mutated mCRC, including synchronous or metachronous disease, management of mCRC with liver and lung metastasis, resectable, potentially resectable or non-resectable tumours and local in the CAC context.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer managementconsensusmetastatic colorectal cancerwild type

Identifiers

PMID29636987
PMCPMC5890062
OpenAlexW2793084102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.