Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636833›Full record

ReviewClinical epigenetics2018

Epigenetics in Turner syndrome.

Francisco Álvarez-Nava, Roberto Lanes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epigenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The impact of mitochondrial dysfunction on ovarian aging.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lifelong medical challenges and immunogenetics of Turner syndrome.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  14. Turner Syndrome where are we?Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francisco Álvarez-Nava1Biological Sciences School, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Central University of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-4673-3643
Roberto Lanes2Pediatric Endocrine Unit, Hospital de Clínicas Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela.
Central University of Ecuador · ECHospital Clínico Universitario de Caracas · VE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Monosomy of the X chromosome is the most frequent genetic abnormality in human as it is present in approximately 2% of all conceptions, although 99% of these embryos are spontaneously miscarried. In postnatal life, clinical features of Turner syndrome may include typical dysmorphic stigmata, short stature, sexual infantilism, and renal, cardiac, skeletal, endocrine and metabolic abnormalities. Main text: Turner syndrome is due to a partial or total loss of the second sexual chromosome, resulting in the development of highly variable clinical features. This phenotype may not merely be due to genomic imbalance from deleted genes but may also result from additive influences on associated genes within a given gene network, with an altered regulation of gene expression triggered by the absence of the second sex chromosome. Current studies in human and mouse models have demonstrated that this chromosomal abnormality leads to epigenetic changes, including differential DNA methylation in specific groups of downstream target genes in pathways associated with several clinical and metabolic features, mostly on autosomal chromosomes. In this article, we begin exploring the potential involvement of both genetic and epigenetic factors in the origin of X chromosome monosomy. We review the dispute between the meiotic and post-zygotic origins of 45,X monosomy, by mainly analyzing the findings from several studies that compare gene expression of the 45,X monosomy to their euploid and/or 47,XXX trisomic cell counterparts on peripheral blood mononuclear cells, amniotic fluid, human fibroblast cells, and induced pluripotent human cell lines. From these studies, a profile of epigenetic changes seems to emerge in response to chromosomal imbalance. An interesting finding of all these studies is that methylation-based and expression-based pathway analyses are complementary, rather than overlapping, and are correlated with the clinical picture displayed by TS subjects. Conclusions: The clarification of these possible causal pathways may have future implications in increasing the life expectancy of these patients and may provide informative targets for early pharmaceutical intervention.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGene Regulatory NetworksChromosomes, Human, XEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansMonosomyTrisomyTurner SyndromeAneuploidyChromatinDNA methylationEmbryonic stem cellsEpigeneticsGene expressionMouse modelsTurner syndrome

Identifiers

PMID29636833
PMCPMC5889574
OpenAlexW2802224646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.