Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636815›Full record

ArticleObstetric medicine2018

The use of PET/CT in pregnancy: A case report of malignant parathyroid carcinoma and a review of the literature.

Manpreet Mona Gill, Winnie Sia, Michael Hoskinson, Erin Niven, Rshmi Khurana

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetric medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Smart scanning for two: [EJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pregnancy and Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manpreet Mona Gill1Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Winnie Sia1Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Michael Hoskinson3Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Erin Niven4Diagnostic Imaging, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada.
Rshmi Khurana1Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography scanning is not commonly performed in pregnancy but can be done if required. Fetal doses of radiation can be minimized, and our case exemplifies the safe application of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in pregnancy. A 38-year-old woman in her first ongoing pregnancy presented at 28 weeks' gestation with symptomatic hypercalcemia. Given a history of parathyroid carcinoma, recurrence was suspected. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging failed to locate the lesion. However, positron emission tomography/computed tomography identified a culprit supraclavicular lymph node. This was excised under local anesthesia resulting in normalization of parathyroid hormone and calcium levels. A term, healthy baby was delivered. The literature provides support that the use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography is acceptable when indicated, and there are modifications to protocols that can further limit risk.

Indexed as

FDGhypercalcemiamalignancyparathyroidpositron emission tomographyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29636815
PMCPMC5888841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.