Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636797›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2018

Empirical and theoretical investigation into the potential impacts of insecticide resistance on the effectiveness of insecticide-treated bed nets.

Katey D Glunt, Maureen Coetzee, Silvie Huijben, A Alphonsine Koffi, Penelope A Lynch, Raphael N'Guessan, Welbeck A Oumbouke, Eleanore D Sternberg, Matthew B Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katey D GluntDepartment of Entomology The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA.
Maureen CoetzeeWits Research Institute for Malaria Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa.
Silvie HuijbenISGlobal Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB) Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-1915
A Alphonsine KoffiInstitut Pierre Richet (IPR) Abidjan Côte d'Ivoire.
Penelope A LynchCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Penryn Campus University of Exeter Cornwall UK.
Raphael N'GuessanInstitut Pierre Richet (IPR) Abidjan Côte d'Ivoire.
Welbeck A OumboukeInstitut Pierre Richet (IPR) Abidjan Côte d'Ivoire.
Eleanore D SternbergDepartment of Entomology The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-4111
Matthew B ThomasDepartment of Entomology The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7684-0386

Funding

Quantifying insecticide impact on malaria transmission: does resistance matter?R21AI113609 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI THOMAS, MATTHEW B · 2015 to 2016
$411k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI113609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of widespread insecticide resistance in vector mosquitoes throughout Africa, there is limited evidence that long-lasting insecticidal bed nets (LLINs) are failing to protect against malaria. Here, we showed that LLIN contact in the course of host-seeking resulted in higher mortality of resistant

Indexed as

Anophelesinsecticide resistancemalariatransmission

Identifiers

PMID29636797
PMCPMC5891045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.