Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636736›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2018

Bacterial Symbionts in Lepidoptera: Their Diversity, Transmission, and Impact on the Host.

Luis R Paniagua Voirol, Enric Frago, Martin Kaltenpoth, Monika Hilker, Nina E Fatouros

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed
30.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 356 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gut microbiome of the grape berry moth,Microbial genomics · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Life inside a bag: multiomics insights into the bagworm species Eumeta crameri.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Luis R Paniagua VoirolInstitute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Enric FragoCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Unité Mixte de Recherche Peuplements Végétaux et Bioagresseurs en Milieu Tropical, Saint-Pierre, La Réunion.
Martin KaltenpothDepartment for Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Monika HilkerInstitute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nina E FatourosBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEPeuplements végétaux et bioagresseurs en milieu tropical · REWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The insect's microbiota is well acknowledged as a "hidden" player influencing essential insect traits. The gut microbiome of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) has been shown to be highly variable between and within species, resulting in a controversy on the functional relevance of gut microbes in this insect order. Here, we aim to (i) review current knowledge on the composition of gut microbial communities across Lepidoptera and (ii) elucidate the drivers of the variability in the lepidopteran gut microbiome and provide an overview on (iii) routes of transfer and (iv) the putative functions of microbes in Lepidoptera. To find out whether Lepidopterans possess a core gut microbiome, we compared studies of the microbiome from 30 lepidopteran species. Gut bacteria of the Enterobacteriaceae, Bacillaceae, and Pseudomonadaceae families were the most widespread across species, with

Indexed as

butterflyendosymbiontsgut bacteriahorizontal transfermaternal transfermothsymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID29636736
PMCPMC5881003
OpenAlexW2794602547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.