Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636635›Full record

ArticleGenetics & epigenetics2018

Comprehensive Evaluation of Commercial Bisulfite-Based DNA Methylation Kits and Development of an Alternative Protocol With Improved Conversion Performance.

Sascha Tierling, Beate Schmitt, Jörn Walter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics & epigenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. DNA Methylation in Solid Tumors: Functions and Methods of Detection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sascha TierlingFaculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Department of Genetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Beate SchmittFaculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Department of Genetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Jörn WalterFaculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Department of Genetics/Epigenetics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Saarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is the most studied epigenetic modification with a wide range of regulatory functions in mammalian genomes. It almost exclusively resides on CpG dinucleotides and, among others, plays important roles in early embryo development, onset, and maintenance of cancer. During the past 3 decades, many approaches have been developed to discriminate methylated from unmethylated DNA including antibody-based enrichment of methylated DNA, restriction enzyme-based, or hybridization-based methods. The conversion of unmethylated cytosines to uracils by sodium or ammonium bisulfite is regarded as golden standard as this approach requires no enzymatic reaction and provides deep and reliable insight in methylation patterns at single-base resolution. Nowadays, there are many commercial kits for bisulfite conversion available but they perform differently and also vary in protocols and chemicals used. Here, we provide the first comprehensive and comparative evaluation of bisulfite conversion kits observing major differences in conversion efficiency and DNA degradation which greatly affect the performance of downstream applications, ie, polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). Moreover, deep sequencing of amplicons containing oxidized derivates of 5'-methylC shows that none of the tested kits efficiently converts 5'-formylC without substantial conversion of 5'-methylC or 5'-hydroxymethylC. Consequently, we developed a robust and easy-to-use protocol that allows maximal discrimination between 5'-formylC and 5'-methylC/5'-hydroxymethylC with low DNA degradation and high PCR efficiency on the bisulfite-treated DNA. We highly recommend to use our time- and cost-efficient protocol for any genome-wide or local high-resolution bisulfite sequencing application to minimize conversion-dependent error rates.

Indexed as

5ʹ-formylcytosineBisulfite conversionDNA methylation

Identifiers

PMID29636635
PMCPMC5888801
OpenAlexW2793268473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.