Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636615›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2018

Psychometric properties of the Patient Dignity Inventory in an acute psychiatric ward: an extension study of the preliminary validation.

Rosaria Di Lorenzo, Paola Ferri, Carlotta Biffarella, Giulio Cabri, Eleonora Carretti, Gabriella Pollutri, Ludovica Spattini, Cinzia Del Giovane, Harvey Max Chochinov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The experiences of psychiatric patients, their caregivers and companions in upholding patient dignity during hospitalization: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rosaria Di LorenzoPsychiatric Intensive Treatment Facility, Mental Health Department, Azienda USL, Modena, Italy.
Paola FerriDepartment of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Carlotta BiffarellaDepartment of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Giulio CabriService of Psychiatric Diagnosis and Treatment, Mental Health Department, Azienda USL, Modena, Italy.
Eleonora CarrettiSchool of Nursing, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Gabriella PollutriSchool of Specialization in Pscyhiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Ludovica SpattiniSchool of Specialization in Pscyhiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cinzia Del GiovaneFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Primary Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Harvey Max ChochinovDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During the last decades, dignity has been an emerging issue in mental health since its ethical and therapeutic implications became known. This study is an extension of the preliminary validation of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) in a psychiatric setting, originally designed for assessing perceived dignity in terminal cancer patients. Methods: From October 21, 2015 to December 31, 2016, we administered the Italian PDI to all patients hospitalized in an acute psychiatric ward, who provided their consent and completed it at discharge (n=165). We performed Cronbach's alpha coefficient and principal factor analysis. We administered other scales concomitantly to analyze the concurrent validity of PDI. We applied stepwise multiple linear regression to identify the patients' demographic and clinical variables related to the PDI score. Results: Our response rate was 93%, with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient=0.94). The factorial analysis showed three factors with eigenvalue >1, which explained >80% of total variance: 1) "loss of self-identity and anxiety for the future", 2) "concerns for social dignity and spiritual life", and 3) "loss of personal autonomy". The PDI and the three factor scores were positively and significantly correlated with the Hamilton Scales for Depression and Anxiety but not with other scale scores. Among patients' variables, "suicide risk" and "insufficient social and economic condition" were positively and significantly correlated with the PDI total score. Conclusion: The PDI can be a reliable tool to assess patients' dignity perception in a psychiatric setting, which suggests that both social and clinical severe conditions are closely related to dignity loss.

Indexed as

dignity perception in psychiatryinsufficient social and economic conditionpatient dignity inventorypatients hospitalized in an acute psychiatric wardsevere psychiatric diseasessuicide risk

Identifiers

PMID29636615
PMCPMC5880412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.