Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636613›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2018

The acceptability of an Internet-based exposure treatment for flying phobia with and without therapist guidance: patients' expectations, satisfaction, treatment preferences, and usability.

Daniel Campos, Adriana Mira, Juana Bretón-López, Diana Castilla, Cristina Botella, Rosa Maria Baños, Soledad Quero

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03900559 (An Internet-based Treatment for Flying Phobia Using 360º Images), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03900559 nacompletednot on this map

An Internet-based Treatment for Flying Phobia Using 360º Images: A Feasibility Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Jaume IRan2018 to 2021Enrolled78ConditionsFlying PhobiaArmsNO-FEAR Airlines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel CamposDepartment of Basic Psychology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Adriana MiraDepartment of Basic Psychology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Juana Bretón-LópezDepartment of Basic Psychology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Diana CastillaDepartment of Basic Psychology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Cristina BotellaDepartment of Basic Psychology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Rosa Maria BañosCIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Barcelona, Spain.
Soledad QueroDepartment of Basic Psychology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Universitat Jaume I · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInternet-based treatments have been tested for several psychological disorders. However, few studies have directly assessed the acceptability of these self-applied interventions in terms of expectations, satisfaction, treatment preferences, and usability. Moreover, no studies provide this type of data on Internet-based treatment for flying phobia (FP), with or without therapist guidance. The aim of this study was to analyze the acceptability of an Internet-based treatment for FP (NO-FEAR Airlines) that includes exposure scenarios composed of images and real sounds. A secondary aim was to compare patients' acceptance of two ways of delivering this treatment (with or without therapist guidance). PATIENTS AND

methodsThe sample included 46 participants from a randomized controlled trial who had received the self-applied intervention with (n = 23) or without (n = 23) therapist guidance. All participants completed an assessment protocol conducted online and by telephone at both pre- and posttreatment.

resultsResults showed good expectations, satisfaction, opinion, and usability, regardless of the presence of therapist guidance, including low aversiveness levels from before to after the intervention. However, participants generally preferred the therapist-supported condition.

conclusionNO-FEAR Airlines is a well-accepted Internet-based treatment that can help enhance the application of the exposure technique, improving patient acceptance and access to FP treatment.

Indexed as

expectationsflying phobiaInternet-based exposuresatisfactiontreatment preferencesusability

Identifiers

PMID29636613
PMCPMC5880416
OpenAlexW2794751706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.