ArticleClinical interventions in aging2018
CHA
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Gastric Cancer Surgery: Bridging Early Diagnosis and Responsible Precision Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based prediction of neurocardiovascular risk score from retinal swept-source optical coherence tomography-angiography.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke After Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Inflammatory cytokines differ between patients with high versus low CHA2DS2-VASc scores in sinus rhythm-a possible mechanism for adverse cardiovascular events.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2022Article
- Does coprescribing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral anticoagulants increase the risk of major bleeding, stroke and systemic embolism?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- CHAAging clinical and experimental research · 2022Article
- CHA2DS2-VASc score as an independent outcome predictor in patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke.PloS one · 2022Article
- Arrhythmia Detection is Improved by 14-Day Continuous Electrocardiography Patch Monitoring and CHA2DS2-VASc Score.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2022Article
- Article
- [Value of CHANan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe CHA
objectiveWe aimed to investigate whether the CHA MATERIALS AND
methodsDuring 2013-2014, 1,071 patients (36.3% with concomitant AF) at least 75 years old were enrolled, and the follow-up ended on July 15, 2017. Variables included sociodemographic characteristics, complications, drugs taken, laboratory results, and echocardiographic parameters. The primary end points were IS, transient ischemic attack, and TE, expressed as IS/TE. All-cause mortality was a secondary end point. Survival curves and mortality risks were assessed via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared by log-rank tests.
resultsThe average follow-up duration was 2.57±1.37 years. Overall, 167 patients (5.6%) died and 77 (7.2%) developed IS/TE. The CHA
conclusionThe CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.