Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636371›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2018

Repeat-mediated deletions can be induced by a chromosomal break far from a repeat, but multiple pathways suppress such rearrangements.

Carlos Mendez-Dorantes, Ragini Bhargava, Jeremy M Stark

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Targeting the DNA Damage Response for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Mendez-DorantesDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, City of Hope, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
Ragini BhargavaDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, City of Hope, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
Jeremy M StarkDepartment of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, City of Hope, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
City of Hope · USCancer Genetics (United States) · US

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
Mechanistic steps of homologous repair in mammalian cellsR01CA120954 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI STARK, JEREMY MICHAEL · 2006 to 2016
$2.2M
Regulation of Single Strand Annealing Repair of Mammalian Chromosomal BreaksR01CA197506 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI STARK, JEREMY MICHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120954NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal deletion rearrangements mediated by repetitive elements often involve repeats separated by several kilobases and sequences that are divergent. While such rearrangements are likely induced by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), it has been unclear how the proximity of DSBs relative to repeat sequences affects the frequency of such events. We generated a reporter assay in mouse cells for a deletion rearrangement involving repeats separated by 0.4 Mb. We induced this repeat-mediated deletion (RMD) rearrangement with two DSBs: the 5' DSB that is just downstream from the first repeat and the 3' DSB that is varying distances upstream of the second repeat. Strikingly, we found that increasing the 3' DSB/repeat distance from 3.3 kb to 28.4 kb causes only a modest decrease in rearrangement frequency. We also found that RMDs are suppressed by KU70 and RAD51 and promoted by RAD52, CtIP, and BRCA1. In addition, we found that 1%-3% sequence divergence substantially suppresses these rearrangements in a manner dependent on the mismatch repair factor MSH2, which is dominant over the suppressive role of KU70. We suggest that a DSB far from a repeat can stimulate repeat-mediated rearrangements, but multiple pathways suppress these events.

Indexed as

Chromosome BreakageChromosome DeletionRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairKu AutoantigenMiceMutS Homolog 2 ProteinRad51 RecombinaseRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1DNADNA-Binding ProteinsKu AutoantigenMsh2 protein, mouseMutS Homolog 2 ProteinRad51 RecombinaseRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRad52 protein, mouseTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1XRCC4 protein, mouseBRCA1chromosomal rearrangementhomologous recombinationKU70MSH2repeat divergence

Identifiers

PMID29636371
PMCPMC5959236
OpenAlexW2798142243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.