Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636042›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Gender differences in the evaluation of care for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study (ZODIAC-52).

Steven H Hendriks, Marco H Blanker, Yvonne Roelofsen, Kornelis J J van Hateren, Klaas H Groenier, Henk J G Bilo, Nanne Kleefstra

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01570140 (Large Scale Demonstrator, Webportal Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01570140 completednot on this map

Large Scale Demonstrator, Webportal Diabetes

TypeobservationalSponsorHenk Bilo, MDRan2012 to 2015Enrolled350ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus Type 2ArmsWeb portal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steven H HendriksDiabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands. shhendriks@outlook.com.
Marco H BlankerDepartment of General Practice, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Yvonne RoelofsenDiabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Kornelis J J van HaterenMedical Research Group, Langerhans, Ommen, the Netherlands.
Klaas H GroenierDepartment of General Practice, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Henk J G BiloDiabetes Centre, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Nanne KleefstraMedical Research Group, Langerhans, Ommen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the association between patient-related factors and patients' evaluation of care. Aim was to investigate which patient-related factors are associated with patients' evaluation of care in men and women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in primary care.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 1102 patients with T2D from 52 general practices. We measured patients' evaluation with the EUROPEP questionnaire and collected demographic, clinical and psychological data from questionnaires and health records. Stepwise linear regression analyses were used.

resultsThe location where the questionnaire was completed (at home or at the general practice) was associated with all outcomes in men and women. Next to this, in men, explanatory factors for the care provider EUROPEP subscale were use of insulin, having some problems with T2D self-care and coffee consumption (R

conclusionsOnly a few factors were found to be associated with patients' evaluation of care for men and women with T2D. Taken together, these factors explained only a small part of the variance of the EUROPEP scores. This explained variance was largely attributable to the location where the questionnaire was completed. We therefore advise to be aware of the possible consequences of filing-out questionnaires about patients' evaluation of care at the general practice.

trial registrationNCT01570140 (Clinicaltrials.gov). Registered 29 March 2012.

Indexed as

General PracticeAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality of LifeSelf CareSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesEvaluation of careHealth care surveysPrimary health careType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID29636042
PMCPMC5891915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.