Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29636030›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2018

Pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis: evaluation of a two-stage surgical strategy (debridement, negative pressure therapy and flap coverage) with prolonged antimicrobial therapy.

Johan Andrianasolo, Tristan Ferry, Fabien Boucher, Joseph Chateau, Hristo Shipkov, Fatiha Daoud, Evelyne Braun, Claire Triffault-Fillit, Thomas Perpoint, Frédéric Laurent and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prehabilitation for Pressure Ulcer Surgery: A Practical and Evidence-based Guide.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. A Review of Phage Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  9. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Therapeutic strategies for chronic wound infection.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Johan AndrianasoloDepartment of infectious diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Tristan FerryDepartment of infectious diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Fabien BoucherCRIOAc Lyon, Regional reference center for the management of complex bone and joint infection, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Joseph ChateauCRIOAc Lyon, Regional reference center for the management of complex bone and joint infection, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Hristo ShipkovCRIOAc Lyon, Regional reference center for the management of complex bone and joint infection, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Fatiha DaoudDepartment of infectious diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Evelyne BraunDepartment of infectious diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Claire Triffault-FillitDepartment of infectious diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Thomas PerpointDepartment of infectious diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Frédéric LaurentCRIOAc Lyon, Regional reference center for the management of complex bone and joint infection, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Alain-Ali MojallalCRIOAc Lyon, Regional reference center for the management of complex bone and joint infection, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Christian ChidiacDepartment of infectious diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Florent ValourDepartment of infectious diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. florent.valour@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-1467-6162
Lyon BJI study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA two-stage surgical strategy (debridement-negative pressure therapy (NPT) and flap coverage) with prolonged antimicrobial therapy is usually proposed in pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis but has not been widely evaluated.

methodsAdult patients with pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis treated by a two-stage surgical strategy were included in a retrospective cohort study. Determinants of superinfection (i.e., additional microbiological findings at reconstruction) and treatment failure were assessed using binary logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis.

resultsSixty-four pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis in 61 patients (age, 47 (IQR, 36-63)) were included. Osteomyelitis was mostly polymicrobial (73%), with a predominance of S. aureus (47%), Enterobacteriaceae spp. (44%) and anaerobes (44%). Flap coverage was performed after 7 (IQR, 5-10) weeks of NPT, with 43 (68%) positive bone samples among which 39 (91%) were superinfections, associated with a high ASA score (OR, 5.8; p = 0.022). An increased prevalence of coagulase negative staphylococci (p = 0.017) and Candida spp. (p = 0.003) was observed at time of flap coverage. An ESBL Enterobacteriaceae spp. was found in 5 (12%) patients, associated with fluoroquinolone consumption (OR, 32.4; p = 0.005). Treatment duration was as 20 (IQR, 14-27) weeks, including 11 (IQR, 8-15) after reconstruction. After a follow-up of 54 (IQR, 27-102) weeks, 15 (23%) failures were observed, associated with previous pressure ulcer (OR, 5.7; p = 0.025) and Actinomyces spp. infection (OR, 9.5; p = 0.027).

conclusionsPressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis is a difficult-to-treat clinical condition, generating an important consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The lack of correlation between outcome and the debridement-to-reconstruction interval argue for a short sequence to limit the total duration of treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Infective AgentsCandidaChronic DiseaseDebridementEnterobacteriaceaeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteomyelitisPressure UlcerRisk FactorsStaphylococcus aureusSurgical FlapsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial therapyBacteriologyChronic osteomyelitisDebridementFlap coverageNegative pressure therapyPressure ulcer

Identifiers

PMID29636030
PMCPMC5894174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.