ArticleBMC cancer2018
Trends in the contemporary incidence of colorectal cancer and patient characteristics in the United Kingdom: a population-based cohort study using The Health Improvement Network.
Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the potential impact of lifestyle-based behavior change interventions delivered at the time of colorectal cancer screening.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Pooled it
- Multicomponent Lifestyle Interventions During Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Diabetes and socioeconomic status as key risk factors for colorectal cancer in the pashtun population: a case-control study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- The Molecular and Functional Landscape of Resistance to FOLFIRI Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Cancer discovery · 2026Article
- Analysis of short-term functional outcomes of colorectal resections in older adults aged 75 years and older: a prospective single health board cohort study.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- The Impact of Preoperative and Postoperative Nutritional Interventions on Treatment Outcomes and Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients-A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Oxaliplatin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: An ACCENT/IDEA Pooled Analysis of 12 Trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Article
- Learning from new colorectal cancers: a qualitative synthesis of significant event reports.BJGP open · 2024Article
- Worrisome Trends in Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Now Is the Time for Action.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022Review
- The Insulin-like Growth Factor System and Colorectal Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Serum anti-DIDO1, anti-CPSF2, and anti-FOXJ2 antibodies as predictive risk markers for acute ischemic stroke.BMC medicine · 2021Article
- The deleterious association between proton pump inhibitors and prostate cancer-specific mortality - a population-based cohort study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2020Article
- Review
- Combining 1,4-dihydroxy quininib with Bevacizumab/FOLFOX alters angiogenic and inflammatory secretions in ex vivo colorectal tumors.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- NSAID therapy for PIK3CA-Altered colorectal, breast, and head and neck cancer.Advances in biological regulation · 2020Review
- A physical activity intervention to improve the quality of life of patients with a stoma: a feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2020Article
- Altered Expression of MBNL Family of Alternative Splicing Factors in Colorectal Cancer.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer registry data show that survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the United Kingdom is poor compared with other European countries and the United States, yet these data sources lack information on patient comorbidities and medication use, which could help explain these differences.
methodsAmong individuals aged 40-89 years in The Health Improvement Network (2000-2014), we identified first ever cases of CRC and calculated incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For CRC cases and non-cases in two separate calendar years (2002 and 2014), we evaluated patient demographics, lifestyle factors, comorbidities and medication use and bowel screening.
resultsThe incidence of CRC remained relatively constant across the study period; incidence rates per 10,000 person-years (95% CIs) were 9.27 (8.59-1.01) in 2000, 10.65 (10.15-11.18) in 2007 and 8.37 (7.93-8.83) in 2014. Incidence rates per 10,000 person-years were higher in men than women at 11.44 (95% CI: 10.35-12.66) vs. 7.40 (95% CI: 6.59-8.32) in 2000, and 9.39 (95% CI: 8.74-10.10) vs. 7.38 (95% CI: 6.81-8.00) in 2014. An increase was seen in the proportion of CRC cases diagnosed at age < 60 years. In 2002, 3.5% of CRC cases were diagnosed at age 40-49 compared with 5.1% in 2014 (p = 0.064). Similarly, in 2002, 12.5% were diagnosed at age 50-59 years compared with 16.2% in 2014 (p = 0.002). Between 2002 and 2014, previous bowel screening increased in both CRC cases (+ 10.6%) and non-cases (+ 9.7%)(p < 0.001 for both groups). Greater rises in the following were seen among CRC cases compared with non-cases: diabetes (+ 9.3% vs. + 3.3%; p < 0.001 for both), obesity (+ 14.5% vs. + 10.1%; p < 0.001 for both), hypertension (+ 8.3% vs. + 3.6%; p < 0.001 for both), atrial fibrillation (+ 2.6% [p < 0.01] vs. + 0.3% [p < 0.001]), and use of proton pump inhibitors (+ 11.5% vs. + 9.0%), anti-hypertensives (+ 9.9% vs. + 1.4%) and warfarin (+ 3.2% vs. + 0.4%); p < 0.001 for CRC cases and non-cases with respect to each medication.
conclusionsCRC incidence has remained relatively stable in the UK over the last decade. The increased prevalence of some comorbidities and medications among CRC cases should be considered when evaluating patterns in CRC survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.