Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29635949›Full record

Trial reportEvaluation & the health professions2018

Multigroup Propensity Score Approach to Evaluating an Effectiveness Trial of the New Beginnings Program.

Jenn-Yun Tein, Gina L Mazza, Heather J Gunn, Hanjoe Kim, Elizabeth A Stuart, Irwin N Sandler, Sharlene A Wolchik

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Evaluation & the health professions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jenn-Yun Tein1 Department of Psychology, REACH Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1164-9898
Gina L Mazza1 Department of Psychology, REACH Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Heather J Gunn1 Department of Psychology, REACH Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Hanjoe Kim2 University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Elizabeth A Stuart3 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Irwin N Sandler1 Department of Psychology, REACH Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Sharlene A Wolchik1 Department of Psychology, REACH Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Funding

Multi-Court Trial of NBP to Prevent Substance Abuse and Mental Health DisorderR01DA026874 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI SANDLER, IRWIN N. · 2011 to 2015
$6.0M
Effects of a parenting-after-divorce program 26 years later on physical health, mental health, and competence outcomes in adult offspring and their childrenR01HD094334 · NICHD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI WOLCHIK, SHARLENE ANN · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094334NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used a multigroup propensity score approach to evaluate a randomized effectiveness trial of the New Beginnings Program (NBP), an intervention targeting divorced or separated families. Two features of effectiveness trials, high nonattendance rates and inclusion of an active control, make program effects harder to detect. To estimate program effects based on actual intervention participation, we created a synthetic inactive control comprised of nonattenders and assessed the impact of attending the NBP or active control relative to no intervention (inactive control). We estimated propensity scores using generalized boosted models and applied inverse probability of treatment weighting for the comparisons. Relative to the inactive control, NBP strengthened parenting quality as well as reduced child exposure to interparental conflict, parent psychological distress, and child internalizing problems. Some effects were moderated by parent gender, parent ethnicity, or child age. On the other hand, the effects of active versus inactive control were minimal for parenting and in the unexpected direction for child internalizing problems. Findings from the propensity score approach complement and enhance the interpretation of findings from the intention-to-treat approach.

Indexed as

DivorceParentingAdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolEthnicityHumansParent-Child RelationsParentsPropensity ScoreSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsStress, Psychologicalchildren of divorceeffectiveness trialintention-to-treat principlepreventive interventionpropensity score analysis

Identifiers

PMID29635949
PMCPMC6054305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.