ArticleCancer medicine2018
Biological signaling pathways and potential mathematical network representations: biological discovery through optimization.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hepatitis C virus infection and Parkinson's disease: insights from a joint sex-stratified BioOptimatics meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- CCR8 as a Therapeutic Novel Target: Omics-Integrated Comprehensive Analysis for Systematically Prioritizing Indications.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Multiple Criteria Optimization (MCO): A gene selection deterministic tool in RStudio.PloS one · 2022Article
- Fluxer: a web application to compute, analyze and visualize genome-scale metabolic flux networks.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Biological signaling pathways and potential mathematical network representations: biological discovery through optimization.Cancer medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Establishing the role that different genes play in the development of cancer is a daunting task. A step toward this end is the detection of genes that are important in the illness from high-throughput biological experiments. Furthermore, it is safe to say that it is highly unlikely that these show expression changes independently, even with a list of potentially important genes. A biological signaling pathway is a more plausible underlying mechanism as favored in the literature. This work attempts to build a mathematical network problem through the analysis of microarray experiments. A preselection of genes is carried out with a multiple criteria optimization framework previously published by our research group . Afterward, application of the Traveling Salesperson Problem and Minimum Spanning Tree network optimization models are proposed to identify potential signaling pathways via the most correlated path among the genes of interest. Biological evidencing is provided to assess the effectiveness of the proposed methods. The capability of our analysis strategy is also demonstrated through the undertaking of meta-analysis studies. Three important aspects are novel in this work: (1) our joint analyses of different groups of lung cancer states reveal new correlations, biologically evidenced, and previously undocumented; (2) computation of the correlation coefficients from expression differences leads to an effective use of network optimization methods; and (3) the methods yield mathematically optimal correlation structures: no other configuration is better correlated using the available information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.