Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29635802›Full record

ArticleContact dermatitis2018

Prevalence of contact allergy to metals in the European general population with a focus on nickel and piercings: The EDEN Fragrance Study.

Marie L A Schuttelaar, Robert F Ofenloch, Magnus Bruze, Simone Cazzaniga, Peter Elsner, Margarida Gonçalo, Luigi Naldi, Åke Svensson, Thomas L Diepgen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contact dermatitis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nickel Allergy in Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Case Report.The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A comprehensive summary of disease variants implicated in metal allergy.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2022
    Review
  10. Immunological Mechanisms of Metal Allergies and the Nickel-Specific TCR-pMHC Interface.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Contact Allergy-Emerging Allergens and Public Health Impact.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marie L A SchuttelaarDepartment of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0766-4382
Robert F OfenlochDepartment of Social Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Magnus BruzeDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2919-3227
Simone CazzanigaCentro Studi GISED, Bergamo, Italy.
Peter ElsnerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7696-3274
Margarida GonçaloDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra University Hospital, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6842-1360
Luigi NaldiCentro Studi GISED, Bergamo, Italy.
Åke SvenssonDepartment of Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Thomas L DiepgenDepartment of Social Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies on sensitization to metals in the general population are scarce.

objectivesTo determine the prevalence of sensitization to metals in the general population, and factors associated with nickel sensitization.

methodsIn 5 European countries (The Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Portugal and Sweden), a random sample (N = 3119) from the general population (aged 18-74 years) was patch tested and interviewed by use of a questionnaire on exposure to metals, piercing, and jewellery.

resultsOverall, the age-standardized prevalences of sensitization to nickel, cobalt and chromium were, respectively, 14.5%, 2.1%, and 0.8%. The highest prevalence of nickel sensitization was seen in Portugal (18.5%) and the lowest (8.3%) in Sweden. The prevalence of cobalt sensitization varied between 3.8% (The Netherlands) and 0.9% (Italy), and the prevalence of chromium sensitization varied between 1.3% (Portugal) and 0.2% (Sweden). Significant associations were observed between nickel allergy and female sex (odds ratio [OR] 5.19; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 3.99-6.74), past piercing use (OR 3.86; 95%CI: 2.85-5.24), and currently having ≥3 piercings (OR 5.58; 95%CI: 4.02-7.76).

conclusionsThe prevalence of sensitization to metals in the European general population was high, mostly because of nickel. The lowest prevalence of contact allergy to nickel and chromium observed in Sweden supports the effectiveness of long-standing regulation.

Indexed as

AdultBody PiercingDermatitis, Allergic ContactEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNickelPatch TestsPrevalenceRisk FactorsYoung AdultNickelchromiumcobaltcontact allergyepidemiologynickelpatch testing

Identifiers

PMID29635802
PMCPMC6001707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.