Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29635306›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Pleiotropic mapping and annotation selection in genome-wide association studies with penalized Gaussian mixture models.

Ping Zeng, Xingjie Hao, Xiang Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bayesian Sparse Mediation Analysis with Targeted Penalization of Natural Indirect Effects.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ping ZengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xingjie HaoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Xiang ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Modeling Polygenic Architecture in Association and Re-sequencing StudiesR01HG009124 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Xiang Zhou · 2017 to 2026
$3.0M
New directions in single cell genomics method developmentR01GM126553 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Mengjie Chen · 2017 to 2026
$2.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009124NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified many genetic loci associated with complex traits. A substantial fraction of these identified loci is associated with multiple traits-a phenomena known as pleiotropy. Identification of pleiotropic associations can help characterize the genetic relationship among complex traits and can facilitate our understanding of disease etiology. Effective pleiotropic association mapping requires the development of statistical methods that can jointly model multiple traits with genome-wide single nucleic polymorphisms (SNPs) together. Results: We develop a joint modeling method, which we refer to as the integrative MApping of Pleiotropic association (iMAP). iMAP models summary statistics from GWASs, uses a multivariate Gaussian distribution to account for phenotypic correlation, simultaneously infers genome-wide SNP association pattern using mixture modeling and has the potential to reveal causal relationship between traits. Importantly, iMAP integrates a large number of SNP functional annotations to substantially improve association mapping power, and, with a sparsity-inducing penalty, is capable of selecting informative annotations from a large, potentially non-informative set. To enable scalable inference of iMAP to association studies with hundreds of thousands of individuals and millions of SNPs, we develop an efficient expectation maximization algorithm based on an approximate penalized regression algorithm. With simulations and comparisons to existing methods, we illustrate the benefits of iMAP in terms of both high association mapping power and accurate estimation of genome-wide SNP association patterns. Finally, we apply iMAP to perform a joint analysis of 48 traits from 31 GWAS consortia together with 40 tissue-specific SNP annotations generated from the Roadmap Project. Availability and implementation: iMAP is freely available at http://www.xzlab.org/software.html. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAlgorithmsNormal DistributionPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID29635306
PMCPMC6084565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.