Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29635216›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2018

Towards circuit optogenetics.

I-Wen Chen, Eirini Papagiakoumou, Valentina Emiliani

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Engineering Neuronal Network Connectivity Through Precise and Scalable Electrical Modulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Scanless two-photon voltage imaging.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Allosteric inactivation of an engineered optogenetic GTPase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I-Wen ChenWavefront-Engineering Microscopy group, Neurophotonics Laboratory, CNRS UMR8250, Paris Descartes University, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, Paris, France.
Eirini PapagiakoumouWavefront-Engineering Microscopy group, Neurophotonics Laboratory, CNRS UMR8250, Paris Descartes University, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France.
Valentina EmilianiWavefront-Engineering Microscopy group, Neurophotonics Laboratory, CNRS UMR8250, Paris Descartes University, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, Paris, France. Electronic address: valentina.emiliani@parisdescartes.fr.
Université Paris Cité · FRNeurophotonics Laboratory · FR

Funding

Three Dimensional Holography for Parallel Multi-target Optogenetic Circuit ManipulationU01NS090501 · NINDS · PIERRE AND MARIE CURIE UNIVERSITY · PI EMILIANI, VALENTINA, PICAUD, SERGE · 2014 to 2016
$941k
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optogenetics neuronal targeting combined with single-photon wide-field illumination has already proved its enormous potential in neuroscience, enabling the optical control of entire neuronal networks and disentangling their role in the control of specific behaviors. However, establishing how a single or a sub-set of neurons controls a specific behavior, or how functionally identical neurons are connected in a particular task, or yet how behaviors can be modified in real-time by the complex wiring diagram of neuronal connections requires more sophisticated approaches enabling to drive neuronal circuits activity with single-cell precision and millisecond temporal resolution. This has motivated on one side the development of flexible optical methods for two-photon (2P) optogenetic activation using either, or a hybrid of two approaches: scanning and parallel illumination. On the other side, it has stimulated the engineering of new opsins with modified spectral characteristics, channel kinetics and spatial distribution of expression, offering the necessary flexibility of choosing the appropriate opsin for each application. The need for optical manipulation of multiple targets with millisecond temporal resolution has imposed three-dimension (3D) parallel holographic illumination as the technique of choice for optical control of neuronal circuits organized in 3D. Today 3D parallel illumination exists in several complementary variants, each with a different degree of simplicity, light uniformity, temporal precision and axial resolution. In parallel, the possibility to reach hundreds of targets in 3D volumes has prompted the development of low-repetition rate amplified laser sources enabling high peak power, while keeping low average power for stimulating each cell. All together those progresses open the way for a precise optical manipulation of neuronal circuits with unprecedented precision and flexibility.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansLuminescent ProteinsNeuronsOptogeneticsLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29635216
PMCPMC6027648
OpenAlexW2796170007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.