ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2018
The Excess Chemical Potential of Water at the Interface with a Protein from End Point Simulations.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting water at the protein interface in cryo-EM structures from MD-excess chemical potential.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- De Novo Hydration of Cryo-EM Reconstructions through Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Excess Chemical Potential.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Elucidating the molecular determinants for binding modes of a third-generation HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor: Importance of side chain and solvent reorganization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Solvation Thermodynamics from the Perspective of Endpoints DFT.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020Review
- Cavity Particle in Aqueous Solution with a Hydrophobic Solute: Structure, Energetics, and Functionals.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020Article
- The UWHAM and SWHAM Software Package.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We use end point simulations to estimate the excess chemical potential of water in the homogeneous liquid and at the interface with a protein in solution. When the pure liquid is taken as the reference, the excess chemical potential of interfacial water is the difference between the solvation free energy of a water molecule at the interface and in the bulk. Using the homogeneous liquid as an example, we show that the solvation free energy for growing a water molecule can be estimated by applying UWHAM to the simulation data generated from the initial and final states (i.e., "the end points") instead of multistate free energy perturbation simulations because of the possible overlaps of the configurations sampled at the end points. Then end point simulations are used to estimate the solvation free energy of water at the interface with a protein in solution. The estimate of the solvation free energy at the interface from two simulations at the end points agrees with the benchmark using 32 states within a 95% confidence interval for most interfacial locations. The ability to accurately estimate the excess chemical potential of water from end point simulations facilitates the statistical thermodynamic analysis of diverse interfacial phenomena. Our focus is on analyzing the excess chemical potential of water at protein receptor binding sites with the goal of using this information to assist in the design of tight binding ligands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.