Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29634761›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

CtGEM typing: Discrimination of Chlamydia trachomatis ocular and urogenital strains and major evolutionary lineages by high resolution melting analysis of two amplified DNA fragments.

Philip M Giffard, Patiyan Andersson, Judith Wilson, Cameron Buckley, Rachael Lilliebridge, Tegan M Harris, Mariana Kleinecke, Kerry-Ann F O'Grady, Wilhelmina M Huston, Stephen B Lambert and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Population-based concordance ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Philip M GiffardGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3030-9127
Patiyan AnderssonGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Judith WilsonGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Cameron BuckleyFaculty of Medicine, Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Rachael LilliebridgeFaculty of Medicine, Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Tegan M HarrisChild Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Mariana KleineckeGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Kerry-Ann F O'GradyCentre for Children's Health Research, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Wilhelmina M HustonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephen B LambertUQ Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David M WhileyFaculty of Medicine, Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Deborah C HoltGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis infects the urogenital tract (UGT) and eyes. Anatomical tropism is correlated with variation in the major outer membrane protein encoded by ompA. Strains possessing the ocular ompA variants A, B, Ba and C are typically found within the phylogenetically coherent "classical ocular lineage". However, variants B, Ba and C have also been found within three distinct strains in Australia, all associated with ocular disease in children and outside the classical ocular lineage. CtGEM genotyping is a method for detecting and discriminating ocular strains and also the major phylogenetic lineages. The rationale was facilitation of surveillance to inform responses to C. trachomatis detection in UGT specimens from young children. CtGEM typing is based on high resolution melting analysis (HRMA) of two PCR amplified fragments with high combinatorial resolving power, as defined by computerised comparison of 65 whole genomes. One fragment is from the hypothetical gene defined by Jali-1891 in the C. trachomatis B_Jali20 genome, while the other is from ompA. Twenty combinatorial CtGEM types have been shown to exist, and these encompass unique genotypes for all known ocular strains, and also delineate the TI and T2 major phylogenetic lineages, identify LGV strains and provide additional resolution beyond this. CtGEM typing and Sanger sequencing were compared with 42 C. trachomatis positive clinical specimens, and there were no disjunctions. CtGEM typing is a highly efficient method designed and tested using large scale comparative genomics. It divides C. trachomatis into clinically and biologically meaningful groups, and may have broad application in surveillance.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenotyping TechniquesBase SequenceChlamydia trachomatisComputer SimulationDNA, BacterialEyeHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesNucleic Acid DenaturationPhylogenySpecies SpecificityTransition TemperatureUrogenital SystemDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID29634761
PMCPMC5892870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.