ArticlePloS one2018
Large scale newborn deafness genetic screening of 142,417 neonates in Wuhan, China.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06183138 (Multicenter Analysis of Genomic and Metabolic Data of Neonatal Genetic Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter Analysis of Genomic and Metabolic Data of Neonatal Genetic Diseases
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic evaluation of newborn deafness gene screening as a public health intervention in China: a modelling study.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Multicolor melting curve analysis discloses high carrier frequency of hearing loss-associated variants among neonates in Jiangsu province.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2024Observational
- Analysis of deafness susceptibility gene of neonates in northern Guangdong, China.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Detecting mitochondrial mutations associated with aminoglycoside ototoxicity by noninvasive prenatal testing.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023Article
- Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss in a Romanian Population: Carrier Status and Frequent Variants in theGenes · 2022Article
- Newborn screening for genetic disorders: Current status and prospects for the future.Pediatric investigation · 2022Review
- Concurrent Hearing and Genetic Screening among Newborns in Ningbo, China.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Assessment of Hearing Screening Combined With Limited and Expanded Genetic Screening for Newborns in Nantong, China.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Concurrent Newborn Hearing and Genetic Screening in a Multi-Ethnic Population in South China.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Etiology of Prelingual Hearing Loss in the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Era: A Scoping Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2020Article
- Next generation sequencing as second-tier test in high-throughput newborn screening for nephropathic cystinosis.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020Article
- A proposal for comprehensive newborn hearing screening to improve identification of deaf and hard-of-hearing children.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- Targeted SLC19A3 gene sequencing of 3000 Saudi newborn: a pilot study toward newborn screening.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019Article
- Panel-based NGS reveals disease-causing mutations in hearing loss patients using BGISEQ-500 platform.Medicine · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Almost one third of the three million people in China suffering severe deafness are children, and 50% of these cases are believed to have genetic components to their etiology. Newborn hearing genetic screening can complement Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening for the diagnosis of congenital hearing loss as well as identifying children at risk for late-onset and progressive hearing impairment. The aim of this joint academic and Ministry of Health project was to prototype a cost effective newborn genetic screen in a community health setting on a city-wide level, and to ascertain the prevalence of variation at loci that have been associated with non-syndromic hearing loss. With the participation of 143 local hospitals in the city of Wuhan, China we screened 142,417 neonates born between May 2014 and Dec. 2015. The variants GJB2 c.235delC, SLC26A4 c.919-2A>G, and mitochondrial variants m.1555A>G and m.1494C>T were assayed using real time PCR. Newborns found to carry a variant were re-assayed by sequencing in duplicate. Within a subset of 707 newborns we assayed using real-time PCR and ARMS-PCR to compare cost, sensitivity and operating procedure. The most frequent hearing loss associated allele detected in this population was the 235delC variant in GJB2 gene. In total, 4289 (3.01%) newborns were found to carry at least one allele of either GJB2 c.235delC, SLC26A4 c.919-2A>G or two assayed MT-RNR1 variants. There was complete accordance between the real-time PCR and the ARMS PCR, though the real-time PCR had a much lower failure rate. Real-time PCR had a lower cost and operating time than ARMS PCR. Ongoing collaboration with the participating hospitals will determine the specificity and sensitivity of the association of the variants with hearing loss at birth and arising in early childhood, allowing an estimation of the benefits of newborn hearing genetic screening in a large-scale community setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.