ArticleNature medicine2018
Corrigendum: Sex-specific transcriptional signatures in human depression.
Article in Nature medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell transcriptomics reveals Sox6 positive interneurons enriched in the prefrontal cortex of female mice vulnerable to chronic social stress.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Article
- Causal relationship and mediating role between depression and cognitive performance.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Neurobiology of resilience in depression: immune and vascular insights from human and animal studies.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021Review
- A validation of the diathesis-stress model for depression in Generation Scotland.Translational psychiatry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/nm.4386.
Identifiers
29634684What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.