Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29634417›Full record

ArticleCancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals2018

Meltem Ocak, Wissam Beaino, Alexander White, Dexing Zeng, Zhengxin Cai, Carolyn J Anderson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheragnosticFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meltem Ocak1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Wissam Beaino1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Alexander White1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Dexing Zeng1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Zhengxin Cai1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Carolyn J Anderson1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this research was to evaluate c(RGDyK) conjugated to phosphonate-based cross-bridged chelators using Cu-free click chemistry in the 4T1 mouse mammary tumor bone metastasis model in comparison with EXPERIMENTAL: Two phosphonate-based cross-bridged chelators (CB-TE1A1P and CB-TE1K1P) were conjugated to c(RGDyK) through bio-orthogonal strain-promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the

resultsThe chelator-peptide conjugates showed similar affinity to integrin αvβ3, in the low nM range. PET imaging demonstrated a higher uptake in bones having metastases for all

conclusionThese data suggest that the phosphonate chelator conjugates of c(RDGyK) peptides are promising PET tracers suitable for imaging tumor-associated osteoclasts in bone metastases.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsChelating AgentsCopper RadioisotopesHumansNeoplasm MetastasisOrganophosphonatesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyChelating AgentsCopper RadioisotopesOrganophosphonatesclick chemistrycopper-64osteoclastαvβ3 integrin

Identifiers

PMID29634417
PMCPMC5865263
OpenAlexW2794687542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.