Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29633960›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018

Superpixel-based and boundary-sensitive convolutional neural network for automated liver segmentation.

Wenjian Qin, Jia Wu, Fei Han, Yixuan Yuan, Wei Zhao, Bulat Ibragimov, Jia Gu, Lei Xing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Artificial intelligence uncertainty quantification in radiotherapy applications - A scoping review.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenjian QinShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, People's Republic of China.
Jia WuMedical Physics Division in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States of America.
Fei HanMedical Physics Division in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States of America.
Yixuan YuanMedical Physics Division in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States of America.
Wei ZhaoMedical Physics Division in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6182-4746
Bulat IbragimovMedical Physics Division in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States of America.
Jia GuShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, People's Republic of China.
Lei XingMedical Physics Division in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States of America.

Funding

DASSIM-RT and Compressed Sensing-Based Inverse PlanningR01CA176553 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI XING, LEI · 2014 to 2018
$2.4M
Computational Tools for Next Generation Volumetric Cone Beam Computed TomographyR01EB016777 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI XING, LEI · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA176553NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation of liver in abdominal computed tomography (CT) is an important step for radiation therapy planning of hepatocellular carcinoma. Practically, a fully automatic segmentation of liver remains challenging because of low soft tissue contrast between liver and its surrounding organs, and its highly deformable shape. The purpose of this work is to develop a novel superpixel-based and boundary sensitive convolutional neural network (SBBS-CNN) pipeline for automated liver segmentation. The entire CT images were first partitioned into superpixel regions, where nearby pixels with similar CT number were aggregated. Secondly, we converted the conventional binary segmentation into a multinomial classification by labeling the superpixels into three classes: interior liver, liver boundary, and non-liver background. By doing this, the boundary region of the liver was explicitly identified and highlighted for the subsequent classification. Thirdly, we computed an entropy-based saliency map for each CT volume, and leveraged this map to guide the sampling of image patches over the superpixels. In this way, more patches were extracted from informative regions (e.g. the liver boundary with irregular changes) and fewer patches were extracted from homogeneous regions. Finally, deep CNN pipeline was built and trained to predict the probability map of the liver boundary. We tested the proposed algorithm in a cohort of 100 patients. With 10-fold cross validation, the SBBS-CNN achieved mean Dice similarity coefficients of 97.31  ±  0.36% and average symmetric surface distance of 1.77  ±  0.49 mm. Moreover, it showed superior performance in comparison with state-of-art methods, including U-Net, pixel-based CNN, active contour, level-sets and graph-cut algorithms. SBBS-CNN provides an accurate and effective tool for automated liver segmentation. It is also envisioned that the proposed framework is directly applicable in other medical image segmentation scenarios.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerAbdomenCohort StudiesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID29633960
PMCPMC5983385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.