Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29633898›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2018

Reactivation of endogenous retroviral elements via treatment with DNMT- and HDAC-inhibitors.

Michael Daskalakis, David Brocks, Yi-Hua Sheng, Md Saiful Islam, Alzbeta Ressnerova, Yassen Assenov, Till Milde, Ina Oehme, Olaf Witt, Ashish Goyal and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Endogenous Retroviruses as Modulators of Innate Immunity.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael Daskalakisa Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8138-0505
David Brocksa Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.
Yi-Hua Shengb School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine , National Taiwan University , Taipei , Taiwan.
Md Saiful Islama Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.
Alzbeta Ressnerovaa Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.
Yassen Assenova Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6992-2092
Till Mildec Translational Program, Hopp Children's Cancer Center at NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ) , Germany.
Ina Oehmec Translational Program, Hopp Children's Cancer Center at NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ) , Germany.
Olaf Wittc Translational Program, Hopp Children's Cancer Center at NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ) , Germany.
Ashish Goyala Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9830-3987
Alexander Kühna Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.
Mark Hartmanna Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4072-4658
Dieter Weichenhana Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.
Manfred Jungh Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Freiburg , Germany.
Christoph Plassa Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors , German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DENational Taiwan University · TWUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTis) or histone deacetylases (HDACis) are epigenetic drugs which are investigated since decades. Several have been approved and are applied in the treatment of hematopoietic and lymphatic malignancies, although their mode of action has not been fully understood. Two recent findings improved mechanistic insights: i) activation of human endogenous retroviral elements (HERVs) with concomitant synthesis of double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs), and ii) massive activation of promoters from long terminal repeats (LTRs) which originated from past HERV invasions. These dsRNAs activate an antiviral response pathway followed by apoptosis. LTR promoter activation leads to synthesis of non-annotated transcripts potentially encoding novel or cryptic proteins. Here, we discuss the current knowledge of the molecular effects exerted by epigenetic drugs with a focus on DNMTis and HDACis. We highlight the role in LTR activation and provide novel data from both in vitro and in vivo epigenetic drug treatment.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesEndogenous RetrovirusesEnzyme InhibitorsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHematologic NeoplasmsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, Double-StrandedTerminal Repeat SequencesVirus ActivationAntineoplastic AgentsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesEnzyme InhibitorsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesRNA, Double-Strandedendogenous retroviral elementsEpigenetic therapyviral mimicry

Identifiers

PMID29633898
PMCPMC6056222
OpenAlexW2798169690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.