ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2018
Factor analysis of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements in Age-Related Olfactory Dysfunction.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2026Article
- Factor Analysis-Based Quantitative Endotyping Improves Associations With CRS Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Outcomes.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Article
- Olfactory Function Recovery in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2025Article
- Olfaction, Eating Preference, and Quality of Life in Cystic Fibrosis Chronic Rhinosinusitis.The Laryngoscope · 2025Observational
- Impact of sociodemographic status and sex on chronic rhinosinusitis and olfaction in people with cystic fibrosis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of CRSwNP in the real-life setting: a review of the literature.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Review
- Validity and Reliability of the Malay Questionnaire for Olfactory Disorders.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2023Article
- [Detection of disorders of the chemical senses-assessment of state of health by those affected].HNO · 2023Review
- Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2023Article
- Regional homogeneity alterations of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging of chronic rhinosinusitis with olfactory dysfunction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Cross-Cultural Validation of the Short Version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements into Italian: Towards Personalized Patient Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Predictive significance of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders-negative statements for olfactory loss in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Article
- Adaptation and Validation of Portuguese Version of Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (PT-ODQ).Cureus · 2022Article
- Depression Symptoms and Olfactory-related Quality of Life.The Laryngoscope · 2022Article
- What about using sniffin' sticks 12 items test to screen post-COVID-19 olfactory disorders?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Article
- Psychometric properties of the brief version of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2021Article
- Arabic Translation and Validation of Olfactory-Specific Quality of Life Assessment Questionnaire.Cureus · 2021Article
- Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus.Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2021Article
- Geographical Variations in Host Predisposition to COVID-19 Related Anosmia, Ageusia, and Neurological Syndromes.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- A brief version of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlfactory-specific quality of life (QOL) can be measured using the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS), which examines various aspects of olfactory dysfunction. It is unknown if certain factors of the QOD-NS differentially impact QOL.
methodsPatients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) completed the QOD-NS, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6-D (SF-6D) health utility measure, and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) depression screen. Exploratory factor analysis of the QOD-NS was performed. Associations between QOD-NS factors and other QOL metrics were analyzed before and after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).
resultsOutcomes were examined on 132 patients. The QOD-NS contains 4 distinct factors. There was no difference in associations between the different factors and baseline clinical characteristics. ESS had greatest effect size (d) on factors 2 and 4 (d = 0.29 and 0.27, respectively, p < 0.05). Postsurgical changes in the SF-6D and SNOT-22 had the strongest correlation with factor 2 scores (r = 0.29 and 0.34, respectively, p < 0.05), and changes in the PHQ-2 had the strongest correlation to factor 3 (r = 0.24, p < 0.05). Abnormal QOD-NS scores at baseline were associated with effect size increases of 50% to 100% (p < 0.05).
conclusionThe QOD-NS measures 4 distinct factors. Eating-related questions had the greatest improvement after ESS. Health utility and CRS-specific QOL improvement most strongly associated with factor 2, while PHQ-2 changes are most highly associated with factor 3, suggesting a differential impact of the factors of the QOD-NS on varying aspects of QOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.