Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29633334›Full record

ReviewAnnals of neurology2018

Ischemic stroke in cancer patients: A review of an underappreciated pathology.

Babak B Navi, Costantino Iadecola

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Cancer Patients With Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Babak B NaviDepartment of Neurology.
Costantino IadecolaDepartment of Neurology.
Cornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NO SYNTHASE GENE EXPRESSION AND CEREBRAL ISCHEMIC DAMAGER01NS034179 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IADECOLA, COSTANTINO · 1995 to 2021
$5.5M
Cancer And Risk Of Ischemic StrokeK23NS091395 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI NAVI, BABAK BENJAMIN · 2015 to 2019
$945k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS091395NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS034179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently 1 in 10 patients with ischemic stroke have comorbid cancer, and this frequency is expected to increase with continued advances in cancer therapeutics prolonging median survival. Well known for its association with venous thrombosis, cancer has recently emerged as a significant risk factor for arterial thromboembolism, including stroke; however, the underlying mechanisms are uncertain. In addition, the optimal strategies to prevent and acutely treat stroke in cancer patients are yet to be established. This review summarizes the current evidence on ischemic stroke risk, biomarkers, pathophysiology, treatments, and prognosis in cancer patients, emphasizing knowledge gaps and the potential strategies to address them. Ann Neurol 2018;83:873-883.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaHumansNeoplasmsPrognosisRisk FactorsStrokeVenous Thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID29633334
PMCPMC6021225
OpenAlexW2798126243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.