Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29633186›Full record

Observational studyUpdates in surgery2018

Enhanced recovery after surgery in gastric cancer: which are the main achievements from the Italian experience?

Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Jacopo Weindelmayer, Andrea Coratti, Andrea Cossu, Luca Gianotti, Stefano Rausei, Andrea Sansonetti, Stefano De Pascale, Italian Group for Enhanced Recovery in Gastric Surgery (ERGS)

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Updates in surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. EarlyWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Uberto Fumagalli RomarioUO Chirurgia Generale 2, ASST Spedali Civili, Piazza Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy. ubertofumagalliromario@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6865-8971
Jacopo WeindelmayerGeneral and Esophagogastric Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Andrea CorattiOncologic and Robotic Surgery, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Andrea CossuDigestive Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, San Raffaele Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Luca GianottiDepartment of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy.
Stefano RauseiGeneral Surgery, Varese, Italy.
Andrea SansonettiGeneral Surgery, Vannini-Figlie di San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Stefano De PascaleUO Chirurgia Generale 2, ASST Spedali Civili, Piazza Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Italian Group for Enhanced Recovery in Gastric Surgery (ERGS)
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITUniversity of Verona · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITFondazione Audiologica Varese · ITIRCCS San Camillo Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last years, the concept of 'enhanced recovery after surgery' (ERAS) has become a routine in the perioperative care of patients undergoing colorectal resection. The application of ERAS programs in gastric surgery had a more difficult penetration into clinical practice, mainly for the introduction of radical changes in the traditional postoperative management. The aim of the study was to analyze the rate of compliance to a standardized ERAS protocol in different Italian centers and evaluate the results in terms of postoperative outcomes. From April 2015 to July 2017, a prospective observational study was conducted among seven centers participating in the Italian Group for Research for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG), in patient candidates to elective gastrectomy for cancer. A standardized ERAS perioperative protocol was approved by all centers. Compliance to the protocol was then evaluated and postoperative outcomes (morbidity and mortality rate, duration of hospital stay and readmission rate) were analyzed. Two-hundred and seventy unselected patients operated on for gastric cancer were enrolled. The median age was 73 years; 40.4% of patients were female; 24.1% had a nutritional risk score ≥ 3. Perioperative chemotherapy was used in 23.7% of cases. Total gastrectomy was performed in 57.4% of patients; minimally invasive approach was adopted in 28.1% of patients. Adherence to the protocol varied between 23 and 88% for single items. It was quite low for pre- and intraoperative items, mainly for items related to nutritional care. Postoperative complications occurred in 35.5% of patients, mortality was 0.7%. Median length of hospital stay was 8 days (range 4-72) and the readmission rate was 6.3%. There is a growing attention on the implementation of ERAS protocol for gastric cancer surgery, but several elements of this protocol are still not routinely adopted, among them items regarding nutritional care.

Indexed as

GastrectomyAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansItalyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsPractice Guidelines as TopicEnhanced recovery after surgeryGastrectomyGastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID29633186
OpenAlexW2798187880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.