Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29633160›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2018

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the 10-Valent Pneumococcal Non-Typeable Haemophilus influenzae Protein D Conjugate Vaccine (PHiD-CV) Compared to the 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) for Universal Mass Vaccination Implementation in New Zealand.

Lijoy Varghese, Louise Talbot, Andrea Govender, Xu-Hao Zhang, Bruce A Mungall

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeableCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lijoy VargheseGSK Pte Ltd, 23 Rochester Park, Singapore, 139234, Singapore. lijoy.x.varghese@gsk.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-424X
Louise TalbotGSK, Auckland, New Zealand.
Andrea GovenderGSK, Auckland, New Zealand.
Xu-Hao ZhangGSK Pte Ltd, 23 Rochester Park, Singapore, 139234, Singapore.
Bruce A MungallGSK Pte Ltd, 23 Rochester Park, Singapore, 139234, Singapore.
Singapore Science Park · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInvasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), pneumonia and acute otitis media (AOM) still represent a significant medical burden in children < 5 years of age in New Zealand (NZ), with marked disparities across socio-economic and ethnic groups. This cost-effectiveness evaluation aims to compare the potential impact of two childhood universal immunisation strategies: vaccination with a 3 + 1 schedule of the 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV, Synflorix, GSK) and the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13, Prevenar 13, Pfizer).

methodsA static Markov-process cohort model was used to simulate the epidemiological and economic burden of pneumococcal diseases on a single-birth cohort over its lifetime. Costs and outcomes were discounted annually at 3.5%. Epidemiological and cost inputs were extracted from the most recently available NZ data, or derived from the most relevant reference countries' sources. The most updated evidence on the efficacies of the corresponding vaccines were used, particularly the significant effectiveness for PHiD-CV against IPD caused by serotype 19A.

resultsThe model estimated that both vaccines have a broadly comparable impact on IPD-related diseases and pneumonia. Due to the additional benefits possible through broader impact on AOM, PHiD-CV is estimated to potentially provide additional discounted cost offsets of approximately NZD 0.8 million over the lifetime of the birth cohort.

conclusionsTo ensure health equity in children, given the substantial burden of pneumonia and AOM, decision-makers should also take into account the impact of PCVs on these diseases for decisions relating to routine infant immunization. GSK STUDY IDENTIFIER: HO-15-16775.

Indexed as

Mass VaccinationChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisHaemophilus InfectionsHaemophilus influenzaeHumansMarkov ChainsNew ZealandOutcome Assessment, Health CarePneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesQuality of Life10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine13-valent pneumococcal vaccinePneumococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID29633160
PMCPMC5940727
OpenAlexW2797431570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.