Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29633151›Full record

GuidelineObesity surgery2018

A Delphi Consensus of the Crucial Steps in Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy Procedures in the Netherlands.

Mirjam A Kaijser, Gabrielle H van Ramshorst, Marloes Emous, Nic J G M Veeger, Bart A van Wagensveld, Jean-Pierre E N Pierie

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Surgical workflow recognition with 3DCNN for Sleeve Gastrectomy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mirjam A KaijserUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Post Graduate School of Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands. mirjamkaijser@gmail.com.
Gabrielle H van RamshorstDepartment of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marloes EmousUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Post Graduate School of Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nic J G M VeegerDepartment of Epidemiology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Bart A van WagensveldQURO Obesity Centers - Middle East, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Jean-Pierre E N PierieUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Post Graduate School of Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBariatric procedures are technically complex and skill demanding. In order to standardize the procedures for research and training, a Delphi analysis was performed to reach consensus on the practice of the laparoscopic gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in the Netherlands.

methodsAfter a pre-round identifying all possible steps from literature and expert opinion within our study group, questionnaires were send to 68 registered Dutch bariatric surgeons, with 73 steps for bypass surgery and 51 steps for sleeve gastrectomy. Statistical analysis was performed to identify steps with and without consensus. This process was repeated to reach consensus of all necessary steps.

resultsThirty-eight participants (56%) responded in the first round and 32 participants (47%) in the second round. After the first Delphi round, 19 steps for gastric bypass (26%) and 14 for sleeve gastrectomy (27%) gained full consensus. After the second round, an additional amount of 10 and 12 sub-steps was confirmed as key steps, respectively. Thirteen steps in the gastric bypass and seven in the gastric sleeve were deemed advisable. Our expert panel showed a high level of consensus expressed in a Cronbach's alpha of 0.82 for the gastric bypass and 0.87 for the sleeve gastrectomy.

conclusionsThe Delphi consensus defined 29 steps for gastric bypass and 26 for sleeve gastrectomy as being crucial for correct performance of these procedures to the standards of our expert panel. These results offer a clear framework for the technical execution of these procedures.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastric BypassConsensusHumansNetherlandsObesity, MorbidSurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesBariatric surgeryDelphi consensusGastric bypassGastric sleeveKey stepsProcedural steps

Identifiers

PMID29633151
PMCPMC6132743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.