Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29633112›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2018

A prospective phase II trial of response adapted whole brain radiotherapy after high dose methotrexate based chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma-analysis of acute toxicity profile and early clinical outcome.

Narayan Adhikari, Ahitagni Biswas, Ajay Gogia, Ranjit Kumar Sahoo, Ajay Garg, Ashima Nehra, Mehar Chand Sharma, Suman Bhasker, Manmohan Singh, Vishnubhatla Sreenivas and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Novel Therapies for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Consolidation Therapy in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Narayan AdhikariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ahitagni BiswasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. dr_ahitagni@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3453-5340
Ajay GogiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ranjit Kumar SahooDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ajay GargDepartment of Neuroradiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashima NehraDepartment of Clinical Neuropsychology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mehar Chand SharmaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Suman BhaskerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Manmohan SinghDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vishnubhatla SreenivasDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rohan ChawlaDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Garima JoshiDepartment of Clinical Neuropsychology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Lalit KumarDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Subhash ChanderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) comprises high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) based chemotherapy followed by whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), the major drawback of which is long term neurotoxicity. We intended to assess the feasibility of response adapted WBRT in PCNSL in the Indian setting.

methodsWe screened 32 patients and enrolled 22 eligible patients with PCNSL from 2015 to 2017 in a prospective phase II trial. The patients underwent five 2-weekly cycles of induction chemotherapy with rituximab, methotrexate, vincristine, procarbazine. Patients with complete response(CR) to induction chemotherapy were given reduced dose WBRT 23.4 Gy/13 fractions/2.5 weeks while those with partial response (PR), stable or progressive disease (SD or PD) were given standard dose WBRT 45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks. Thereafter two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with cytarabine were given. The primary endpoints of the study were assessment of response rate (RR) and progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints of the study were assessment of overall survival (OS), toxicity profile of treatment and serial changes in quality of life and neuropsychological parameters.

resultsOut of 19 patients who completed HDMTX based chemotherapy, 10 (52.63%) patients achieved CR, 8 (42.11%) patients had PR and 1 patient had PD. After a median follow-up period of 11.25 months, the estimated median OS was 19 months. The actuarial rates of PFS and OS were respectively 94.1 and 68.2% at 1 year and 50.2 and 48.5% at 2 years. Three patients in reduced dose WBRT arm had recurrence and two of them died of progressive disease, whereas there was no recurrence or disease related death in standard dose WBRT arm. On univariate analysis of PFS, age ≤ 50 years and use of standard dose WBRT (45 Gy) led to significantly improved outcome (p value 0.03 and 0.02 respectively).

conclusionIn patients with PCNSL, reduced dose WBRT after CR to HDMTX based chemotherapy may lead to suboptimal clinical outcome due to higher risk of recurrence, progression and early death. Trial Registration No CTRI/2015/10/006268.

Indexed as

Cranial IrradiationAdultAgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDose Fractionation, RadiationFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphomaMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticMethotrexateHigh dose methotrexatePrimary CNS lymphomaWhole brain radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29633112
OpenAlexW2796739223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.