ArticleDer Orthopade2018
[Surface modifications of implants. Part 1 : Material technical and biological principles].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shock Wave-Activated Silver-Loaded Biopolymer Implant Coating EliminatesPharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Biological Cell Investigation of Structured Nitinol Surfaces for the Functionalization of Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- [Surface modifications of implants. Part 2 : Clinical application].Der Orthopade · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biological effects of implants in vivo are not only dependent on the implantation site and patient-specific factors but are also influenced by the physicochemical composition and the surface topography of the biomaterial. In cases of permanent implants applied to bone, primary stability, the promotion of rapid osteointegration and antimicrobial properties of the implant are strived for; however, surface modifications are also found on biomaterials which only temporarily come into contact with tissue. These include not only osteosynthesis materials, jig or implant templates but also surgical instruments. This article summarizes the relevant technical principles of materials for the assessment of implant surfaces. Besides technical material-specific and biological principles, different surface modifications for targeted clinical applications are presented. Furthermore, current developmental strategies are outlined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29632974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.