ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2018
Policies and availability of orphan medicines in outpatient care in 24 European countries.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of moral reasons on orphan drug reimbursement.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Evolution and synergy of healthcare security policies for rare diseases in China: a quantitative content analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement information (PPRI): evolution and impact of a policy network over two decades.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Review
- Overview of Orphan Medicines in European Union: An Analysis of Regulatory and Technical-Scientific Aspects.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Review
- EMA approved orphan medicines since the implementation of the orphan legislation.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Clinical and non-clinical aspects of reimbursement policy for orphan drugs in selected European countries.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- A qualitative study on the views of experts on the social impact of the high-priced orphan drug nusinersen.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Real-world use of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) in rare disease (RD) patients: A population-based registry study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Trends in orphan drug use and spending among children and adolescents during 2010-2020 in Korea.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Public spending on orphan medicines: a review of the literature.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2020Article
- Reimbursement of Orphan Drugs in Europe in Relation to the Type of Authorization by the European Medicines Agency and the Decision Making Based on Health Technology Assessment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess pricing and reimbursement policies specific to orphan medicines and the availability and distribution settings of ten recently authorised medicinal products suitable for outpatient care with orphan status and centralised marketing authorisation in Europe, and whether patients receive these products free of charge or have to pay some or all of the costs themselves.
methodsWeb survey to authorities and representatives of third party payers in the Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information (PPRI) network in April 2016.
resultsIn most of the 24 countries, special policies were not implemented in the assessment of reimbursement status (22 countries) or in the pricing (20 countries) of orphan medicines. An average of five of the ten recently authorised products per country were available for outpatient care. Products were dispensed from community pharmacies in eight countries and from health care units in five countries. In four countries, both distribution settings were used. When products were dispensed from community pharmacies, patients typically paid some of the price themselves. Products dispensed from health care units were often free of charge for patients.
conclusionsMost European countries had not implemented pricing and reimbursement policies specific to orphan medicines. The availability of orphan products varied between countries. It is important to discuss whether orphan medicines should be considered as a separate group in the reimbursement regulations in order to secure patient access to these medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29632962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.