ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2017
A Systematic Review of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Fat Graft Preparation Methods.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Autologous Fat Grafting in Regenerative Surgery through Stem Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2023Pooled it
- Supplementation of Facial Fat Grafting to Increase Volume Retention: A Systematic Review.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2022Pooled it
- Fat grafting and platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A feasibility-randomised controlled trial.International wound journal · 2020Trial
- Bronchoscopic management of bronchopleural fistula using free fat pad transplant with platelet-rich plasma: a case study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Contemporary Prophylactic Antibiotic Practices and Adjunct Therapies in Autologous Fat Grafting Procedures: A Survey of The Aesthetic Society Members.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2024Article
- Article
- Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Fat Grafts for Facial Lipofilling: A Randomized, Controlled Split-Face Clinical Trial.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Cutaneous Wounds.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020Article
- Delayed two steps PRP injection strategy for the improvement of fat graft survival with superior angiogenesis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Safety of Technique and Procedure of Stromal Vascular Fraction Therapy: From Liposuction to Cell Administration.Scientifica · 2020Article
- The use of fat grafting and platelet-rich plasma for wound healing: A review of the current evidence.International wound journal · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe addition of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to adipose tissue may improve fat graft survival, although graft retention rates vary markedly between studies. To what extent this outcome heterogeneity reflects differing methodological factors remains unknown. This systematic review aims to synthesize and critically review methodological approaches to autologous PRP and fat cotransplantation in both human and animal studies.
methodsIn accordance with PRISMA guidelines, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to April 2017. Data were extracted from all in vivo studies involving autologous PRP and fat cotransplantation. A secondary aim was to assess reporting of technical detail; authors were not contacted to provide missing data.
resultsFrom 335 articles, 23 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Some 21 were performed in humans and 2 in rabbits. Six studies were randomized control trials; the remainder reported on observational data. Methods of PRP extraction and activation varied markedly between studies. Fat graft preparation was comparatively more consistent. Methods of PRP and fat mixing differed significantly, especially with regards to relative volume/volume ratios.
conclusionsOur study represents the first systematic review of methodological factors in autologous PRP and fat cotransplantation. It demonstrates that technical factors in graft preparation and administration vary significantly between in vivo studies. Such methodological heterogeneity may explain observed differences in experimental and clinical outcomes. Reporting of key procedural information is inconsistent and often inadequate. These issues make meaningful evaluation of the PRP-enhanced fat grafting literature difficult and may limit its translation into clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.