Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29632701›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2018

Viral and bacterial investigations on the aetiology of recurrent pig neonatal diarrhoea cases in Spain.

Susana Mesonero-Escuredo, Katrin Strutzberg-Minder, Carlos Casanovas, Joaquim Segalés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Porcine astrovirus: a review.Archives of virology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Detection of EnterotoxigenicLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susana Mesonero-EscuredoIDT Biologika SL, Gran Vía Carles III, 84, 3°, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Katrin Strutzberg-MinderIVD Innovative Veterinary Diagnostics (IVD GmbH) Albert-Einstein-Str. 5, 30926 Seelze, Germany.
Carlos CasanovasIDT Biologika SL, Gran Vía Carles III, 84, 3°, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Joaquim Segalés3Departament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1539-7261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal diarrhoea represents a major disease problem in the early stages of animal production, increasing significantly pre-weaning mortality and piglets weaned below the target weight. Enteric diseases in newborn piglets are often of endemic presentation, but may also occur as outbreaks with high morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to assess the frequency of different pathogens involved in cases of recurrent neonatal diarrhoea in Spain.

resultsA total of 327 litters from 109 sow farms located in Spain with neonatal recurrent diarrhoea were sampled to establish a differential diagnosis against the main enteric pathogens in piglets. In total, 105 out of 109 (96.3%) case submissions were positive to one of the examined enteric organisms considered potentially pathogenic (

conclusionIn conclusion,

Indexed as

CoronavirusC. perfringensE. coliFrequencyNeonatal diarrhoeaRotavirusSpain

Identifiers

PMID29632701
PMCPMC5885353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.