Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29632690›Full record

ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2016

The feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial comparing arthroscopic hip surgery to conservative care for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: the FASHIoN feasibility study.

D R Griffin, E J Dickenson, P D H Wall, A Realpe, A Adams, N Parsons, R Hobson, J Achten, M L Costa, N E Foster and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. What is this thing they call research?Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D R GriffinWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
E J DickensonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
P D H WallWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
A RealpeWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
A AdamsDivision of Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
N ParsonsDepartment of Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
R HobsonWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
J AchtenWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
M L CostaWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
N E FosterArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
C E HutchinsonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
S PetrouArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
J L DonovanSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Warwick · GBKeele University · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health PC6/CSA04/01Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine whether it was feasible to perform a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing arthroscopic hip surgery to conservative care in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study had two phases: a pre-pilot and pilot RCT. In the pre-pilot, we conducted interviews with clinicians who treated FAI and with FAI patients to determine their views about an RCT. We developed protocols for operative and conservative care. In the pilot RCT, we determined the rates of patient eligibility, recruitment and retention, to investigate the feasibility of the protocol and we established methods to assess treatment fidelity. In the pre-pilot phase, 32 clinicians were interviewed, of which 26 reported theoretical equipoise, but in example scenarios 7 failed to show clinical equipoise. Eighteen patients treated for FAI were also interviewed, the majority of whom felt that surgery and conservative care were acceptable treatments. Surgery was viewed by patients as a 'definitive solution'. Patients were motivated to participate in research but were uncomfortable about randomization. Randomization was more acceptable if the alternative was available at the end of the trial. In the pilot phase, 151 patients were assessed for eligibility. Sixty were eligible and invited to take part in the pilot RCT; 42 consented to randomization. Follow-up was 100% at 12 months. Assessments of treatment fidelity were satisfactory. An RCT to compare arthroscopic hip surgery with conservative care in patients with FAI is challenging but feasible. Recruitment has started for a full RCT.

Identifiers

PMID29632690
PMCPMC5883184
OpenAlexW2541643768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.