Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29632685›Full record

ReviewJournal of hip preservation surgery2016

Imaging of femoroacetabular impingement-current concepts.

Christoph E Albers, Nicholas Wambeek, Markus S Hanke, Florian Schmaranzer, Gareth H Prosser, Piers J Yates

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Use of Biologics for Hip Preservation.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christoph E AlbersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital and Fremantle Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Nicholas WambeekDepartment of Radiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital and Fremantle Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Markus S HankeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Florian SchmaranzerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Gareth H ProsserDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital and Fremantle Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Piers J YatesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital and Fremantle Hospital, Perth, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the recognition of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) as a clinical entity, diagnostic tools have continuously evolved. While the diagnosis of FAI is primarily made based on the patients' history and clinical examination, imaging of FAI is indispensable. Routine diagnostic work-up consists of a set of plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR-arthrography. Recent advances in MRI technology include biochemically sensitive sequences bearing the potential to detect degenerative changes of the hip joint at an early stage prior to their appearance on conventional imaging modalities. Computed tomography may serve as an adjunct. Advantages of CT include superior bone to soft tissue contrast, making CT applicable for image-guiding software tools that allow evaluation of the underlying dynamic mechanisms causing FAI. This article provides a summary of current concepts of imaging in FAI and a review of the literature on recent advances, and their application to clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID29632685
PMCPMC5883171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.