ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2018
Ordering Protein Contact Matrices.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous biophysical approaches provide information about residues spatial proximity in proteins. However, correct assignment of the protein fold from this proximity information is not straightforward if the spatially close protein residues are not assigned to residues in the primary sequence. Here, we propose an algorithm to assign such residue numbers by ordering the columns and lines of the raw protein contact matrix directly obtained from proximity information between unassigned amino acids. The ordering problem is formatted as the search of a trail within a graph connecting protein residues through the nonzero contact values. The algorithm performs in two steps: (i) finding the longest trail of the graph using an original dynamic programming algorithm, (ii) clustering the individual ordered matrices using a self-organizing map (SOM) approach. The combination of the dynamic programming and self-organizing map approaches constitutes a quite innovative point of the present work. The algorithm was validated on a set of about 900 proteins, representative of the sizes and proportions of secondary structures observed in the Protein Data Bank. The algorithm was revealed to be efficient for noise levels up to 40%, obtaining average gaps of about 20% at maximum between ordered and initial matrices. The proposed approach paves the ways toward a method of fold prediction from noisy proximity information, as TM scores larger than 0.5 have been obtained for ten randomly chosen proteins, in the case of a noise level of 10%. The methods has been also validated on two experimental cases, on which it performed satisfactorily.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.