Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29632634›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients - a pooled analysis of individual patient data from eight prospectively randomized controlled trials.

Gabriel von Waldenfels, Sibylle Loibl, Jenny Furlanetto, Anna Machleidt, Bianca Lederer, Carsten Denkert, Claus Hanusch, Sherko Kümmel, Gunter von Minckwitz, Andreas Schneeweiss and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Strategies to enhance management of HER2-positive breast cancer in the elderly: an expert consensus perspective.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Acute toxicity and tolerability of anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens in older versus younger patients with breast cancer: real-world data.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gabriel von WaldenfelsDepartment of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Jenny FurlanettoGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Anna MachleidtDepartment of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Bianca LedererGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Carsten DenkertInstitute of Pathology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Claus HanuschRotkreuzklinikum, Munich, Germany.
Sherko KümmelBreast Center, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Gunter von MinckwitzGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael UntchHELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Kerstin RhiemCenter for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany.
Peter A FaschingDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Jens-Uwe BlohmerDepartment of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent studies showed the high and independent impact of age (<40 years) on pathologic complete response (pCR) and prognosis for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Some physicians might not consider elderly patients (>65 years) for NACT due to poor prognosis or higher toxicity. The aim of this analysis is to help selecting appropriately elderly women who would benefit from NACT. Secondly, survival parameters are investigated in several histological subgroups.

methodsFrom 1998 to 2010, eight prospectively randomized German Breast Group (GBG) trials of anthracycline- and taxane-based NACT were performed and analyzed in this study.

resultsCompared to the overall average, elderly women had significant larger tumors and more overall lymph node involvement. Histologically, they had more G2 tumors, more estrogen-receptor positive tumors. pCR (ypT0 ypN0) was strongly associated with age. The multivariable logistic regression analysis of clinical parameters showed that young age, clinical stage T4, invasive ductal cancer and poor differentiated breast cancer are predictive for high pCR. The multivariate analyses of molecular subgroups showed that age >65years is a predictor of significant lower pCR in HER2 DISCUSSION: This study underlines the unfavorable impact of higher age on pCR, but it shows a realistic chance for pCR if NACT is applied - especially for HER2+ patients. Furthermore, elderly patients with non-TNBC showed a good prognosis (comparable to younger patients) regarding overall survival, even if they do not have pCR.

Indexed as

breastcancer survivalelderlyGerotargetneoadjuvantpCR

Identifiers

PMID29632634
PMCPMC5880594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.